|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Hi All, I spent the weekend at the AKfest in Livonia MI. It was a great time with LOTS to see, but I spent most of the time listening to Dan Csomos' new horns. Man do they sound great. Solid wood horn tops and bottom flares. Driven by the JBL 2445 CD with the True X Tent barrilium (SP) diaphragms. The bottom cab is about 5 cu ft and has the Lambda TD15X driver. These are just prototypes but the fit and finish is outstanding and the sound is huge....with....great imaging. I don't often find the two in the same speaker. They are flat from about 24hz to 20khz. Here are some pix. The horn flares and down posts are mahagony and the lighter wood is, I think, Maple. I think Dan is planning on putting them up on some sort of spikes. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Glad they sound good, but I am surprised at the "bi-radial" horn design. It's basically a diffraction slot loaded with two horn surfaces, one a simple conical and the other being two spherical surfaces. In general diffraction slots don't sound that good...
what is a "True X Tent" diaphragm? Link? Thanks... _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eburg
|
__________________
flesh flash flush |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
The horn flares are Tractrix flares. I am not really up on all the mechanics of horns, but I've had all the big JBLs, Altecs, Klipschs, Yuccies, and these, for what ever reason, sound better than any of them. I have mine on order.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
I was at AKFest as well. I think that these speakers looked much better than they sounded - but visually they were quite impressive. I cannot imagine the labor involved in making them however.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Hi Earl, I would be interested in your thoughts on how they sounded. I wish I would have bumped into you at the fest. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Well they were harsh, just like all diffraction horns. They were the best sounding speakers at the show, I would agree with that - in general the speakers there were very bad. Rooms like that are never going to work well, which is why I never show anything in that type of venue. Those speakers were typical of the sound quality of a premium set of two way horn loaded system of a decade or more ago. A modern horn/waveguide won't have the diffraction and reflections that a diffraction horn will and the sound quality will always be much better. Horn design has come a long way in the last 20 years and the horn design on those systems is quite dated.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
I have found that it is difficult to sometimes look at the horn and then conclude what its expansion rate is (conical etc). It really does require physically measuring the beast and plotting the expansion rate. While on the topic of a possible diffraction slot, was there any claim that these were CD horns? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
That it was "conical" was a guess, that it is a diffraction horn is pretty obvious. Actually it cannot be "conical", but I think that is beside the point.
I don't know what was claimed. I don't usually ask because people will tell you what they think that you want to hear and they never seem to have anything to support their claims. So your better off just drawing your own conclusions. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think I said the two side walls are conical... ok, flat then ok? ... the "baby cheeks" appear to be spherical sections.
Not sure what part of it is supposed to be "tractrix"?? The entry point to the horn is by definition a diffraction slot, it can be identified by the "rectangular" shape with sharp edges - that is a diffraction slot. _-_-bear _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Check out my new horns! | lowpoke | Multi-Way | 16 | 22nd February 2010 03:09 AM |
| Horns inside of horns open foe discussion | oilcanracer | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th February 2010 03:42 AM |
| Pretty impressive! | Magura | The Lounge | 4 | 2nd November 2009 05:30 PM |
| smith horns and using compression horns for a Karlson party speaker project | bikehorn | Multi-Way | 10 | 27th December 2005 09:10 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11534 seconds (80.83% PHP - 19.17% MySQL) with 11 queries |