|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Shunt resistors in parallel really tame the Impedance curve well (along with the phase).
Lpads (resistor in series and a resistor in parallel) really tame the hiss found in CDs and also smooth out that impedance curve. So they have benefits in terms of the measurements and lower noise floor but what about the SQ. Is this an audiophile opinion, where resistors are just a necessary evil and Lpads are just a compromise? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
It's quite hard to build a crossover without them unless you get lucky with driver combinations not needing padding or corrections.
I've tried Ceramic (NI wirewound), MOX, Mills etc resistors and differences would only be very minor and any reduction in SQ is more than made up by having the speaker tonally balanced. Put it this way, I've never heard a speaker ruined by the use of a resistor.
__________________
No longer DIY active |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about modelling Lpads in LSPCad | morbo | Multi-Way | 2 | 11th March 2005 05:55 PM |
| Resistors in x-over - audible? | TNT | Multi-Way | 0 | 3rd August 2004 08:04 PM |
| parts express lpads | smak | Parts | 1 | 16th May 2004 02:18 PM |
| Shunt volume controll (scaling the shunt resistors) | Freddie | Solid State | 7 | 30th August 2001 09:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.05876 seconds (79.81% PHP - 20.19% MySQL) with 10 queries |