|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NYC
|
Thanks for yesterday's replies re open baffles - very helpful. Does anyone have any experience building them out of a material other than wood? Maybe a plastic or a metal?
Looking at Mr. Linkwitz's Phoenix speakers, I noticed the monopole surrounds. He notes that they are not ideal for HT. But, Loudspeaker Design Cookbook suggests that a monopole pointing up at the ceiling is significantly better than most arrangements and probably only bested by a box with angled baffles and perhaps two woofers/two tweeters. With the reduced frequency ranges required of surround speakers, it seems that one speaker could do the trick here, eliminating the crossover. I'm leaning towards Mr. Linkwitz's surround design for four rear speakers - two on either side of a 9'+ couch and two in back. All would be positioned about 2'-3' above the listeners' heads when seated, but I probably won't be able to place them more than a foot to either side or in back of the couch. Arguments for Linkwitz's design: 1. I'd like people sitting anywhere on the couch to be able to enjoy music or movies without feeling the sound is too unbalanced. These speakers are supposed to be very diffuse. 2. I like Mr. Linkwitz's design and think something very aesthetically-pleasing could be made with it. 3. These surrounds would be significantly less expensive than two woofers and a tweeter or two per box + crossover. I'm more interested in building a solid music system than the perfect HT, but I do want the HT to be there at times. Would I be making a huge mistake by using these speakers for HT? Can someone talk me down off this ledge? Thanks again. brad |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
|
If your talking AC3 or DTS or 5.1 music then the surround speakers must be fullrange and must act as a point source ....
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I've heard of using corian, plexiglass, lucite, concrete, and acrylic (among others) for loudspeaker design. With the exception of the concrete, most of the others are very pricey, and concrete can be difficult to work with. For an OB design, I would stick to more common materials, like MDF.
__________________
Bryan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| css fr125 monopole | nebojsa | Full Range | 15 | 2nd February 2008 04:48 AM |
| Omnipole, monopole, dipole and...nopole?? | terry j | Multi-Way | 25 | 1st July 2007 03:28 AM |
| Linaeum monopole tweeter | DeeJayBump | Swap Meet | 9 | 16th February 2007 06:07 AM |
| Dipole vs monopole, balls or not ... ? | Jussi | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th May 2006 03:38 PM |
| DBX vs BSS vs 24/96 for Dipole/Monopole combo..... | gavinson | Multi-Way | 0 | 29th November 2005 12:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07377 seconds (70.65% PHP - 29.35% MySQL) with 10 queries |