|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Hello all!
I am working on a concept for very invisible corner speakers. The woofer is chosen, it will be this SEAS, crossed at 1 kHz. THE ART OF SOUND PERFECTION BY SEAS - H1488-08 L16RNX The tweeter will have a constant directivity horn. High SPL is not necessary, so virtually every 1" driver will do it down to 1 kHz. Perfect time alignment is not possible of course, so an other solution will have to be found. With an Eighteensound horn and a Celestion driver one would have an offset of the half wavelength at the crossover frequency. My question: Is this essential, or can the phases be adjusted, so that shorter horn/driver combinations would do it, too? Oliver |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Imho, that depends on two things or maybe three.
Can you get that setup to create a proper stereo image? Can you hear the time/phase difference? Some people feel that flat amplitude response is paramount and phase relationships of this sort are either inaudible or of less significance. With that woofer, I would be concerned about getting the huge peak in the HF end of the response controlled and cut off, otherwise with a "normal" crossover, that area will be audible... The question is what will the "offset" actually be after you apply the xover to it? The xover will have some delay and phase shift depending upon what xover you employ - the physical relationship that you mention is only part of the story. And, if it is a half wavelength, perhaps you can flip the phase of one driver and have a zero wavelength difference? What's the physical distance that a half wavelength at 1kHz is equal to? Can you not physically compensate for that?? _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
I am not concerned about phase relationship, I just don't want to have a cancellation at the crossover point. I thought with the half wavelength (17.2 cm) I can use the same crossover I would have used otherwise, just with one polarity reversed. Physical compensation is impossible, woofer and horn have to be mounted on the same baffle. Placement of the woofer will be in a way that enclosure and walls work like a horn up to 1 kHz, so this will reduce the danger of getting problems with the giant resonance peak.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY Time Alignment. | clipto333 | Car Audio | 32 | 4th January 2011 05:48 AM |
| Time alignment | jmar | Multi-Way | 7 | 1st January 2010 02:51 PM |
| time alignment? | flaevor | Multi-Way | 7 | 18th August 2006 12:51 PM |
| time alignment and postion | offroadbum | Car Audio | 2 | 24th March 2004 11:18 AM |
| is doing time alignment now a waste of time? | Beggar | Multi-Way | 9 | 28th July 2003 05:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12170 seconds (64.90% PHP - 35.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |