|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#32 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
|
Hi, I just received my WT3 and first I wanted to test some 15" car woofers I had laying around.
The spec sheet that came with the driver says that mms is 126g, so to measure vas I started with adding 100g in the middle of the cone, driver standing horizontal. Now I got the msg that the added weight was to small, so I added more and more....and more, until the added weight was 344g. As you can see in the attached file, WT3 says that this driver has a mms of 392g. I also tried with the driver standing vertical, then mms is measured to 402g. This driver has a very stiff rubber surround, could that throw off the results? Spec sheet says Cms is 217.7 Um/n Im gonna try and make a test box and see if it gives different results. BTW, this is a dual voice coil, and Im measuring both at the same time, connected in series. Last edited by vinnie; 17th May 2010 at 07:17 AM. |
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: "Space Coast" Florida, USA
|
Quote:
Typically 30 to 100 grams is al you need, but never more than the mass of the original cone. Also, errors for Vas are not uncommon nor represent a big problem in the end. Doing both added mass and closed box Vas testing is a good tact. Just make sure there are no leaks in the box. Even so, leakage past the driver's vent will affect the results slightly. |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Quote:
I know I had to make sure I set my recording to 2 channel 41K bit but that was it. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Randers, Denmark
|
Indeed. I remember som DIY'ers in a danish forum, also claiming that manufactur spec's was wrong by a fair margin. But, when a pro-engineer joined the discussion, and giving advice on how to measure correctly, suddenly the DIY'ers came close to the official specs.
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
PCM2900B
TPA6111A2 LMV358 That's all I'm sayin'.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Anyone else with a WT3 upgrade to the V2.0 software? It now includes a "rub and buzz" test feature along with LCR measurment functions.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
#38 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cheltenham
|
I haven't used the "Rub & Buzz" test but I've found the LCR tests very handy to check parallel or series resistors and for unwinding or winding inductors. I think it's good practice to measure components, even if the value is printed on the side.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dayton WT3 Woofer Tester available next month! | BHTX | Multi-Way | 14 | 30th October 2007 07:32 PM |
| Dayton Woofer Tester II Anyone try this? | Zero Cool | Multi-Way | 5 | 14th May 2006 01:09 AM |
| Anybody tested the Dayton woofer tester 2 | ostie01 | Multi-Way | 4 | 17th April 2006 03:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |