|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: oz
|
Hi all
I recently read in one of our l;ocal mags a description of bi-wiring and bi-amping. The description for the bi-wiring seemed ok enough but the description for bi-amping was a concern. Absolutely no mention of an active crossover approach... What was suggested was providing a dedicated amp (channel) for each driver (ok so far) but to split the passive crossover (assuming a parallel design) filter for each driver. Ie: bass driver = amp via an inductor (for 6db/oct etc.) tweet to be driven by amp filtered by cap etc.etc. the crossover components for one driver would not be electrically linked other than through the power amp. Is this sensible , real or whatever?. As i see it each amp would still be processing the full frequency range as no filter is noted to be placed ahead of the amps (low level), all amps to receive full freq range. Is this approach valid ? any comments Regards from down under.
__________________
george a |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
|
You could do it that way but you'd lose the advantages of getting rid of the passive crossovers and also you need far less power from the amplifiers if they all handle individual parts of the frequency range .... in short doing it the way they have described is only just marginally better than bi-wiring.
__________________
- Dan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: oz
|
Thanks Dan
I thought as much, didn't think it was a well researched article. Not the first time i've seen questionable info in local mags. Makes you wonder George
__________________
george a |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
__________________
UrSv Those who say it can't be done should not stop those who are doing it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
You could go part of the way to real biamping if you put a suitable size capacitor at the input of your tweeter amp, to give an F3 point at least an octave down from the speaker's passive XO point. This way the tweeter amp wouldn't be producing the full range, and you could use a smaller amp. I'm not sure how much benefit you would get sonically, but you would certainly have more power available to the tweeter.
Mick |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wiring HT2 MTM | ZoZat | Multi-Way | 4 | 15th May 2009 09:17 PM |
| Focusing on wiring cable for gainclone!!!Share ur experience in wiring cable.... | thomgun_lc | Chip Amps | 38 | 31st August 2005 02:46 PM |
| I'm wiring my 4 channel 8 parallel LM4780 boards... check my wiring :) | Audiophilenoob | Chip Amps | 9 | 16th August 2005 04:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08671 seconds (73.02% PHP - 26.98% MySQL) with 10 queries |