Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2010, 01:27 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tyrone Ga. U.S.A.
Default Hi pass question

I have a speaker I want to put on an open baffel and run almost full range. The 6ohm speaker has a QTS of .8 and a fs of 42 hz but
of cource the impedience rises at fs. Just using a hipass cap would there be a way to figure the optimum capacitor value to get sort of flat responce down to about 60hz. I know using impedience compensation at
fs would make this a lot easier but this calls for some realy large caps.

The reason I am thinking about this is an amp I am building the ZENLIGHT
calls for an output cap. I am sort of thinking I might get by here with
a cap in the 100uf to 200uf range if I just want it to go down to 60hz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2010, 01:57 AM   #2
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Unfortunately I think you are out of luck here. Because of the impedance peak at Fs, you will need some very big and expensive parts to create a flat impedance at 42Hz for the cap to roll the response off smoothly.

This is also the reason why the "high level" outputs on some subwoofer plate amps are a terrible idea. They generally just have a 100uF cap in series to act as a high pass filter for the speakers. Unfortunately whomever thought up this idea didn't realize that a speaker is not a resistor, so the resulting response is quite terrible.

What I would recommend is a simple active high pass filter before the amp. If you intend to use the amp always with the same source, then you will know input impedance and can get away with a passive line level filter.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2010, 01:59 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
tsmith1315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Doerun, GA
With no impedance compensation, use the actual impedance of the speaker at 60Hz as a starting point rather than the 6 ohm nominal figure.

It would probably be easier/less expensive to filter to the amp's input instead.


edit: sorry for the simultaneous posting, DcibeL
__________________
Tim

Last edited by tsmith1315; 14th January 2010 at 02:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
By-pass capacitor question rtate Digital Line Level 4 17th December 2008 03:37 PM
Question for Nelson Pass Addicted Help!! Pass Labs 16 26th April 2007 06:12 PM
Question for Mr.Pass Metric Pass Labs 5 27th May 2005 09:17 PM
Question to Mr. Pass Metric Pass Labs 7 19th April 2005 10:13 PM
Question for the One and Only. (Mr. Pass) K-amps Pass Labs 7 4th February 2004 06:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Page generated in 0.07230 seconds (69.71% PHP - 30.29% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio