75 degree waveguide, any good reason?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
If you using a 75 degree waveguide tweeter with a direct radiating Mid driver, won't you have to crossover above the pistonic range if you want matching directivity? In other words you'll have midrange cone breakup in you response.

Does that seem correct?

Is there any reason you'd want this directivity pattern?

Thanks,

Dan
 
If you using a 75 degree waveguide tweeter with a direct radiating Mid driver, won't you have to crossover above the pistonic range if you want matching directivity? In other words you'll have midrange cone breakup in you response.

Does that seem correct?

Is there any reason you'd want this directivity pattern?

Thanks,

Dan

Dan

There is not enough information to answer this question.
 
Basically that is correct, yes. Why? In detail, it might differ somewhat.
Exactly what I was thinking.

So why does Parts Express build a 75 degree waveguide which in my measurements are down 9 dBs at 45 degrees. My ten inch woofers then have to be crossed higher into their break-up region in order to match them. About 2.5 kHz instead of 1.5kHz for a 90 degree WG. It seems a 75degree WG would only make it harder for the DIY community to get their design right by doing this--there's a good chance the woofer's response will be rippled and have an erratic decay plus the center to center spacing at the crossover frequency will be further apart. So I figure there must be a good reason to build such a device. My guess is that it will work better in larger rooms b/c it can minimize early reflection problems. It seems that the benefit wouldn't outweigh the advantages in anything but a large have or gymnasium or if you are concerned with mastering your own score. Any other input?

Thanks,

Dan
 
Oh one other question someone smarter than me might be able to answer: is there an equation that would accurately predict a driver's beaming behavior if pistonic behavior is assumed at all frequencies(even though I know this does not actually exist)?

Thanks again,

Dan
 
From Altec literature...

Variable ka is the ratio of the circumference of the speaker, or baffle, to a wavelength. High ka numbers indicate high frequency. A loudspeaker will be omnidirectional starting at ka=1 and the beamwidth will halve for each octave increase in frequency. A baffle will act as a half-space baffle until it reaches about ka=2, where it makes a transistion (45 degrees on log/log graph) to 360 degrees at ka=1. Half space radiation is about 160 degrees (-6db) in real world situations instead of the 180 degrees predicted theoretically. Any loudspeaker in a large baffle is not affected by that baffle at high frequencies where the free-air beamwidth is smaller than 160 degrees or so.
 

Attachments

  • Piston.jpg
    Piston.jpg
    83 KB · Views: 138
Hi Dan

This is audio, logic need not apply.

That's funny. I've debated audio nuts and gurus that claim just that point with me--even a manufacturer!:eek: Yet they have literature and/or design criteria proclaiming their products' and/or builds' superiority. :confused: "Just don't make sense."--Ross Perot

LineSource, thank you for that information! It is useful. I think I actually understand it. hahaha

Dan
 
Seems to be what most constant directivity designs are marketed for - HEY THESE SPEAKERS ARE LOUD AND THEY WONT FEEDBACK INTO YOUR SM58s AND 57s DID WE MENTION THEY ARE LOUD!!!!

I heard some of these just the other day. They were painful even at reasonable listening levels. I've got some at home at the moment that aren't bad. Not incredible, but not painful for the most part. They are a VERY rough build--well actually not built yet to any real degree. Just in the design and listen phase.

Dan
 
Seems to be what most constant directivity designs are marketed for - HEY THESE SPEAKERS ARE LOUD AND THEY WONT FEEDBACK INTO YOUR SM58s AND 57s DID WE MENTION THEY ARE LOUD!!!!

For large venues that is quite true. It has always amazed me that large CD speakers are right for large rooms and small rooms, but for completely different reasons. Who'd guess!
 
Different reasons entirely? I think I know what you mean, but maybe not. I think some of the reasons are the same.

Dan

Mostly different. In a large venue I want high directivity so as to get the sound only where I want it because I can't afford to waste any. In a small room I have much more sound than I need so wasting it is not an issue, but I want to avoid the room boundaries so I need high directivity. Seems different to me, but its all how you look at it I suppose.
 
Mostly different. In a large venue I want high directivity so as to get the sound only where I want it because I can't afford to waste any. In a small room I have much more sound than I need so wasting it is not an issue, but I want to avoid the room boundaries so I need high directivity. Seems different to me, but its all how you look at it I suppose.

The ability to aim the sound where it's needed and avoid VERs is what I was getting at. It's just POV. Either way I like the idea of controlled directivity.

Dan
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.