Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th May 2003, 04:25 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Default Anybody built the Fostex horn designs?

Any feedback on the manufacturer's own designs for Fostex?

I particularly like the FF85K back loaded horn design, but I find the writeup kinda fishy:

FF85K

Especially where they show the response graph with the big crater at 100-200Hz, but then say that's just the 1 m response, actual listening position is OK.

Make sense?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2003, 01:36 PM   #2
chops is offline chops  United States
diyAudio Member
 
chops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lakeland, Florida
It doesn't sound so fishy to me. Not all speakers sound good in the near-field. Plus, you have to remember that those tests are also made in an anechoic room.

Since all loudspeakers are designed to sound best when set up in a regular, everyday room, that is where it counts. Some loudspeakers are meant to sound best with the help of room interactions like 1st and 2nd reflections and standing waves to reinforce where the output of the loudspeaker is lacking at the 1 meter mark.

And don't forget that room placement plays a huge factor on how the loudspeaker sounds.

I hope this sheds a little light on things for you.
__________________
Charles
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2003, 04:51 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Brett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
It's a path length difference. There is a delay in the rear radiation because it's travelled so much further. I bet the distance is close to correct for a 180* phase difference at the frequency of the dip. If that sort of thing really concerns you, don't use a rear horn, and don't ever look at an IMP response of a speaker at the listening position in a room. Can you say Himalayas?

Cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th May 2003, 10:11 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Thanks,

Actually, what I really meant and should have said more clearly is:

Why would the manufacturer show only the one response curve, with a noticeable defect, explain the defect as not present in the listening position, but not show the response curve for the listening position or any other response curve for that matter?

Is this a case of a tech paper written to an audience more knowledgable than me, or a manufacturer slapping a coat of paint on a rusty car?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want a box built for your fostex ? norman bates Full Range 2 11th December 2008 11:12 PM
Compendium of Fostex FE206E designs quadtech Full Range 8 15th August 2008 09:15 AM
Fostex Enclosure Designs rcayot Full Range 4 27th December 2007 11:14 PM
Why do some Fostex BR designs recommend HP reflectors? arjscott Full Range 6 30th May 2006 04:14 PM
Any designs with Fostex FF125K? Lil_JV Multi-Way 1 13th April 2004 03:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2