Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th December 2009, 07:24 AM   #1
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default C17x4 speaker project - active XO

Hei, i mentioned in another thread a while that i was in the process of designing a speaker using four 6,5 midwoofers and a tweeter.

But now the project is really starting to take shape, and i could need some of you expertice.

I've built a 4th order active XlO @2500, and added a 6th order subsonic filter at 40hz. The filter measures perfectly, and the phase between drivers are excellent. The speaker will be driven using 4 of the channels from a 22kg monster surround reciever. Denon AVC A10S.

This graph shows two of the mids together with a Monacor tweeter mounted on a waveguide. Two main problems occur: spl is down some 12db(!!) at 150hz, and tweeter is boosted way to much at 3,5khz by the waveguide.
Click the image to open in full size.

So here is my questions:
Tweeter: How much hassle to remove the 3,5khz peak? Would i be better off just dropping the waveguide? Should i use a different tweeter?

Midbass-drivers: How to best attack the problems in the midbass?

And another important issue: Driver placement! WWTWW, WTWWW or TWWWW? I would prefer getting away with a 2-way system, rather than 2,5-way.
Click the image to open in full size.

XO measured directly, Black line is my soundcards respons.
http://avforum.no/forum/attachments/...lt-direkte.jpg

Last edited by skogs; 7th December 2009 at 07:28 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2009, 08:32 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
TWWWW
Re:' I would prefer getting away with a 2-way system, rather than 2,5-way' - why?
2.5 will give you full baffle step & a better balanced system... OK, It'll make a fully active system a bit more complex though, perhaps you do this using a 1st order passive line level xover for the .5 woofers. Personally. I'd xover the tweeters passivly, the main benefit from going active comes from the low-mid crossover...
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2009, 07:11 AM   #3
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Using four 6,5" gives alot of output, and would require a lot from the tweeter, that's why i want to cross over with as high order as possible. LR4 would be rather difficult getting correct and with good phase respons.
Making it 2,5-way would require two more dedicated amplifier channels, and i think it would be a shame wasting 130W per 2 tiny 6,5".

But in the end you are probably right. I'm currently building a TWWWW baffel, and i can try both 2-way and 2,5-way. Maybe i could even try passive tweeter xo, in that case i could actually use the amplifiers in my main surround amplifier on them.

Do you think passive HP against active LP, would be a good idea? And i'm thinking about power handling, phase respons and matching with the woofers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2009, 05:44 PM   #4
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Got a TWWWW up and running now. The midbass is awesome, but the overall sound is really "screamy" (in lack of a better word). Voices are very pronounced and sounds unaturally high pitched. Heavy guitar-riffs sounds very harsh and annoying at slightly loud levels (90db++).

Any idea of what could be causing this? TWWWW-setup? distorting tweeter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 02:32 PM   #5
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Could really need some help here people. Any ideas why the sound can be so harsh when it measures so beautiful?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 02:57 PM   #6
doug20 is offline doug20  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by skogs View Post
Could really need some help here people. Any ideas why the sound can be so harsh when it measures so beautiful?
Did you do off axis measurements? Could you post your measurements? Im curious to why the harshness doesn't come up in your measurements.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 05:56 PM   #7
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Here's the response measured from sweetspot. From this plot you would think that it sounded very warm, but it does certainly not.
Click the image to open in full size.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg c17x4 sweetspot.JPG (28.2 KB, 265 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 06:05 PM   #8
doug20 is offline doug20  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
What about impedance, phase, off axis, distortion and other more important measurements?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 06:15 PM   #9
skogs is offline skogs  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
The reverse null is not as it should be, only a few db down at the xo. But i get ca 4db "boost" at the XO-point between bass og tweeter, so the phase cant be that bad. Off-axis measurements becomes very inaccurate, as the room is far less than optimal, so i cant tell if its the speakers or the room that causes the differences.

But i havent really measured any of it properly, except the reverse null. If you could elaborate a little how these parameters could affect the sound, that would be very nice of you. I would greatly appreciate it!

Edit: The sound sounds thin and harsh even at levels under 80-90db, could it be distortion at these low levels?

Last edited by skogs; 10th December 2009 at 06:17 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2009, 09:00 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
some possibilities - perhaps the drivers are crossed over at the wrong point, do you have links to data sheets? or it may be simply that there is not enough attenuation on the tweeter... Have you dealt with baffle step in your filter?
re: 'Heavy guitar-riffs sounds very harsh and annoying ' - don't they always? maybe it's your test music, try something less complex, Heavy music is one of the hardest to get a good sound on...
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HT project-active...would like some discussion coby Multi-Way 12 9th April 2007 10:46 AM
Active speaker project Salinas Multi-Way 2 18th August 2005 08:57 PM
Looking For An Active Subwoofer Project brokenbinil Subwoofers 7 6th February 2004 10:40 AM
Need amp recs for active dipole speaker project goskers Solid State 3 3rd June 2003 03:36 PM
Suggestions for amps for active speaker project pinkmouse Solid State 4 16th August 2002 01:36 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.11233 seconds (78.78% PHP - 21.22% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio