|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hello,
I am almost done with the cabinets for my 2-way project and yesterday i started to run some simulations using WinISD. The drivers employeed are the Revelator 18W4531G00 and the XT25TG unscreened. I run the simulations and it appears that with a Q = 0.707 the F3 is around 70Hz when sealed, the group delays at 60Hz are 4s. 2nd order rolloff, I expect the room gain to compensate with +3-4db at max. The problem is that an F3 of 70Hz means i will loose a little over an octave which I need, because I mainly listen to piano/acoustic music. As the 2-way is a very big compromise, especially when sealed, I am aware that the ported design would be a better option for this woofer/design and using it I could regain the lost octave with a little phase change and additional group delays under 60Hz. When playing with different options, I noticed that the SS likes a bigger box volume, anything between 35-40l, when ported and tuned 30-34Hz. I`m fine with this. Question: Is there anybody who has tested this woofer in a sealed enclosure and would you be so kind to post some measurements and your listening impressions? What I am concerned is the bass performance under 70Hz. X-over will be 2Khz or 2.2Khz, a 2nd order Bessel to woofer and 2nd order to the tweeter with a notch at the Fs to try clear XT`s strong efforts to play as a midrange ( I have noticed that ).
__________________
www.mariopankov.com Last edited by Mario Pankov; 4th December 2009 at 12:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
None has ever tried it? I will be covering the front panel with leather and the add-on of a port would be very hard after the wrapping. This is why I ask. I have red comments by Zaph that this woofer may go deep even in a sealed, but he has not mentioned what results he has got ( he was describing the 8531 version, I got the 4531 which has higher Fs but looks better suitable for a sealed box, this is why I bought it ). I am not sure whether John is on this website so any input from others would be appreciated.
__________________
www.mariopankov.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tubie Noobie
diyAudio Member
|
You could put the port in the back, Unless it goes on a shelf. Or use a piece of trim to make a nice clean edge for the cutout.
Just built a system with the exact same woofer. I went ported, however. During the initial crossover design phase it was in a sealed box. 1.1ft^3. It sounded very good with acoustic music. Unfortunatley I didn't have any measurements down that low.
__________________
Living Life Doing the Waltz in 4/4 meter. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hello SGregory,
When I ran the simulations, if placed in a 14l box WinISD gives an F3 at around 70Hz, not bad at all. If we add the room gain, It might be quite good. I decided to run a test myself, I will build a test cab, a sealed straight box and will see whether this one will play deep enough at home. If not - decision is easy. As I see this is an exotic use of this driver, as nobody but you replied for almost two weeks, I will do some measurements and will post them here. Merry Christmas!
__________________
www.mariopankov.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Hi Mario,
see the attached picture - it is a purely passive design in about 15 liters. Unfortunately I have no measurements. My listening impressions: not a lot of bass but what you get is precise. It lacks the warm punch of some vented systems - people who visit are more impressed with my vented (Dayton based) speaker. But I'm pretty happy. Next step will be an active design (also to equalize the bass a little bit). Regards
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Scanspeak 15w k01- or k00 | Tristanc1 | Swap Meet | 0 | 7th April 2009 05:20 PM |
| Scanspeak 25W/7564? | Elbert | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th January 2009 03:29 PM |
| ScanSpeak 9500 | Rybaudio | Swap Meet | 9 | 15th July 2008 02:20 PM |
| ScanSpeak 3/4 way | naamanf | Multi-Way | 2 | 20th December 2006 11:24 PM |
| Sealed midbass vs BR, why not sealed ? | mbon | Multi-Way | 3 | 16th June 2004 10:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08604 seconds (74.53% PHP - 25.47% MySQL) with 10 queries |