|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
This may be an amature question, but also complicated - at least too much for me.
I'm working on an active dipole/open baffle crossover. I'm using two small neo tweeters, back to back, wired out of phase to make a dipole tweeter. They normally have a second order HP character (f3 of about 2000Hz). Used dipole, this becomes 3rd order due to dipole roll off. I've blown my prior pair of tweeters (from switching/static, not music), so now I'm going to include protection - a cap at the crossover point. This gives a total acoustic roll off of -24dB/oct (fourth order) at 2000Hz.Here is my issue - I want a 2nd order acoustic roll off, but I also need to attenuate the LF content before it hits the tweeter, right? I would minimally want to HP the signal hitting the tweeter at 12dB/oct, before it hits the tweeter? How do I do this? The only way I see is to put a 2nd order passive filter between the amp and tweeter, then boost the lows in the active XO to get a 2nd order acoustic HP filter. There must be an easier way...
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Earth
|
When all is said and done, turning a 3rd order native acoustic response into a final 2nd order acoustic means you are boosting the lows, not cutting them, no matter how you get there electrically.
What is your desired Fc? If it's high enough, say 4K or above, you could tailor the response so it's 2nd order for a while and then rolls off much steeper at a lower frequency, say below 2K.
__________________
Dennis H |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
No filters are symmetrical for infinitely long. Usually 2 octaves of target rolloff is considered sufficient for most filters.
What's your target crossover point? Why are you decided upon a 2nd order target function?
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
Thanks for the input. I guess I'm being too particular - I wanted to get things 'perfect', but that definitely isn't possible. I guess I'll try and cross at about 3.2kHz, although I'm not happy with that - my previous tweeters were crossed at 1700Hz without problem, but these need to be crossed much higher...
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wave transformation, Higher order modes? | thadman | Multi-Way | 2 | 5th November 2009 11:53 AM |
| Effect of changing C but not L in higher order xovers | madisonears | Multi-Way | 2 | 2nd August 2009 01:06 PM |
| Higher order crossovers is it possible with LM4780? | diysmartdeep21 | Chip Amps | 0 | 10th February 2005 12:17 PM |
| does lower order xover have any advantages? | andy2 | Multi-Way | 3 | 20th November 2004 03:57 PM |
| Definition of 4th order acoustic crossover | moving_electron | Multi-Way | 4 | 8th April 2004 12:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07710 seconds (68.78% PHP - 31.22% MySQL) with 10 queries |