|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#901 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#902 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Quote:
__________________
Hear the real thing! |
|
|
|
#903 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tampa
|
Quote:
Could you please explain, in technical and scientific terms, exactly what makes a system "revealing" and how you went about designing this feature? Seems that would be invaluable information for those seeking to hear cables listening to recorded media. Thanks. Quote:
Perhaps it is the act of measuring itself that is inducing the hearing deficiencies? BTW, I use quad ampliflication myself, but have no low cut dresses covering my system. So I guess mine isn't "revealing enough" either. cheers, AJ |
||
|
|
#904 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Groan.
OK, IMO, wire can & does make both measurable & audible differences to a system, but none of it has a blind thing to do with the lies & half-truths churned out in advertising for high priced wire. Its LCR parameters simply affect the behaviour of the components it's tying together. Swap out 10ga speaker wire for something 30ga but otherwise identical in design & construction. You will find both audible & measureable changes. Rocket science it is not; common-sense? Er, yes. Does one sound 'better' than the other? Depends on the system & what you're trying to achieve as to which is preferable, or indeed, if there are any audible differences. What's rather amusing is that carrying a signal really isn't that difficult a task. Compared to, say, what the amplifier has to do it's laughably simple. Studios seem to manage it all the time & they do the recordings for pity's sake. Some of the most beloved of 'audiophile recordings' date from the 1950s... odd, because something tells me the studios weren't using monsterously priced wire. If they even gave it more than a passing thought, which is unlikely if it was doing its duty. Look at the waffle about group delay in wire. I don't know about you guys, but a ~16 micron apparant difference in distance between HF & LF isn't causing me lost sleep. Another favourite of mine is Nordost. Nice looking products. I was howling with laughter over a review I read commenting that their more expensive cables tend to provide improved LF clarity & dynamics & speculating on various pseduo-scientific reasons for it. Personally, I'm wondering if it might possibly have something to do with the fact that they have more metal in them, lowering resistance & increasing the usable LF BW of the wire, when before it was too small to avoid clipping LF transients? |
|
|
#905 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
For sure if you design / build speakers, measurements is very important but in the end you have to listen to it to decide whether it can accurately reproduce the sound of different instruments. That you can only do by listening. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
#906 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#907 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
What is your system again?
|
|
|
#908 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Glasgow
|
I have several cables (ICs and speaker), they all sound different. I suspect their measured resistance / capacitance / inductance are similar. The sonic differences are not subtle.
My current IC is a listening compromise. It is "better" in some areas than my other similarly priced IC, but worse in others. Overall I prefer it. Not sure about some of the rather simplistic psychology going on here - although it undoubtedly plays some part. I invested a lot of time and effort weaving CAT5 cables and hated the sound from the start. I bought a silver IC kit and struggled to enjoy what I heard. In both cases the psychology would have been for me to ignore their shortcomings. Reading about high-end cables - what fun. One manufacturer claimed that his wire was designed with an air dielectric, only touching the teflon at a few tiny points along it's length. Another boasted that the teflon was tightly bonded to the wire at all points. Both claimed that the design resulted in the best possible transmission of the signal. What was the question again?
__________________
FLAC, Ethernet over Mains, SB3, GD Audio DAC 19, Tubelab SE 45, FE206eN in Scotmoose Sachikos with Fostex FT17h supertweeters 0.68uF cap.
|
|
|
#909 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
Pre-amp, fully balanced dual mono, own design. Speakers, 2.5 way transmission line with Seas Exell drivers, own design. CD Player, modified Marantz 63KI. |
|
|
|
#910 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Drivers?
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.24924 seconds (69.53% PHP - 30.47% MySQL) with 11 queries |