|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#181 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Anyone care to guess the number of electrons per second (or even per microsecond, if you want to belong to the Church of Must Pass RF) in a femtoamp? Or a thousandth of a femtoamp? It´s a pretty darn big number, hardly a "few."
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
#182 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever I leave my hat
|
Quote:
It's complicated or am I missing s/thing? |
|
|
|
#183 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
![]() Let's see, since 1 Coulomb represents 6.24 x 10<sup>18</sup> electrons, and 1 Amp represents 1 Coulomb of charge per second, then the number of electrons per second at 1 x 10<sup>-9</sup> Amps would be (6.24 x 10<sup>18</sup>) x (1 x 10<sup>-9</sup>) or 6.24 x 10<sup>9</sup> or (in my best Carl Sagan impression) 6.24 billion electrons per second. Yes? se |
|
|
|
#184 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
se |
|
|
|
#185 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Koinichiwa,
Quote:
But you see, with a lot of things I don't feel like doing that. You are smart enough and educated enough in the subject to be able to find your own answers. You may find that often I merely point people into certain directions - saying "have a look there!". The reasons for that are many, among those chief is: "Something given has no value and as a result is not valued by those you give it to. Make them work for it and they will greatly cherish the same self thing they previously would have thrown away as having no value." So I both expect and encourage you to do your own work. I am happy to share experiences and ideas, but they are mostly meant as pointers to things not common on the beaten path. While it may not seem like it at times, I have no interest to "convert" people to my views or "proove" to them that I am right and they are wrong. There is no milage in that. What I do have an interest in is to make people think and to make them explore the things often less explored. I suspect it is that more than anything what some people identify as "Guru" attitude. Sayonara |
|
|
|
#186 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
|
hmm, maby an easier determination. does changing cables make more of a differance than moving 1 ft to the left? what about more effect as changing the position or angle of one of the spekaers? is this a HUGE effect, like a skipping CD, or a small one? when would you reccomed getting upgraded cables over say better speakers, better amplifer components, ect...
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil... |
|
|
#187 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
If you can do that for an outlay much more modest than changing any of the above then, why not? It's not because there are some exorbitantly priced cables out there that you can't brew your own that can come close. People often think that silverwire is expensive but in reality it is not that expensive at all, it offers the added advantage of lower series resistance which allows you to reduce wire diameter, hence skin-effect if ampacity is not an issue. Either way, it's a sound investment since if and when you upgrade yor other gear you'll be hearing it as is. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
#188 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Oops. Sorry, SY. Thought you were referring to Thorsten's 1 x 10<sup>-9</sup> figure.
At 1 Femtoamp, it'd be 6.24 million electrons and at one thousandth of a Femtoamp it'd be 6,240 electrons. se |
|
|
#189 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Yes, that's right. And, as you point out, the concept of electrons "flowing" is flawed- except at DC. When quantum theory is invoked to explain audio phenomena, it's a good indication that (Ebers-Moll and the like aside) we're dealing with wild speculation on the basis of zero reliable evidence.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
#190 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm coming a bit late in this discussion but I can only say one thing: I didn't believe cables make a difference, until I tried
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.21298 seconds (67.97% PHP - 32.03% MySQL) with 11 queries |