|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA
|
Does anyone know of any measurements demonstrating the effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of Anthony Gallo's damping technique as described in this patent? I did a search but didn't come up with much.
Few |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Maine, USA
|
In case having to read through the first couple of pages of the patent is putting people off, here's the bottom line: Gallo uses rolled, crumpled, or folded thin resilient plastic sheets (such as the plastic wrap used to wrap left over food in the kitchen, e.g. Saran wrap) as stuffing material.
His patent claims it is superior to the more conventional fibrous materials and provides a table to substantiate his claims that when the same woofer and enclosure are used in two systems, one stuffed with fiberglass and the other stuffed with his sheets, the one with sheets exhibits much higher output at the lowest frequencies and a resonance with reduced Q. From the patent: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
|
Another method to drastically reduce the Q of the mechanical resonance is filling the enclosure with cotton cloth. I read this in "Current-driving of loudspeakers" by Esa Meriläinen. It is useful in current-driven loudspeakers, where the electrical damping disappears.
The patent claims: "improves electro-acoustic conversion efficiency, especially at low electric power levels". That may be true using traditional definition of power efficiency which assumes a constant nominal impedance (e.g. 4 ohms) across the band. Which also makes it really a voltage sensitivity figure. However, from a real power efficiency standpoint, the reduction in Q dramatically reduces efficiency at resonance. Much higher current is required for the same output and power dissipated in voice coil is i^2 * Re. A reduction in resonance frequency would be more useful if operation at low frequencies is needed. Attached two graphs of a woofer under constant amplitude of current with varied box internal damping and box volume (varied Q and Fc respectively). Last edited by breez; 22nd November 2009 at 09:07 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a speaker level, low pass filter for Gallo sub... | steve rb | Subwoofers | 0 | 11th September 2009 02:23 PM |
| Jung/Gallo "LT" preamp and op-amps... | FidPup | Solid State | 1 | 25th September 2008 05:41 PM |
| Gallo A'Diva Ti versus Jordan JS92 | Gaoki | Full Range | 1 | 23rd September 2008 12:00 PM |
| Need a passive low bass unit for Anthony Gallo Micros | fazman | Multi-Way | 0 | 31st May 2005 06:29 AM |
| Wanted: Lineaum and/or Gallo CDT tweeters | CHRIS8 | Swap Meet | 3 | 27th May 2002 09:35 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09532 seconds (71.93% PHP - 28.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |