Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th November 2009, 04:09 PM   #1
cuibono is offline cuibono  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cuibono's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
Default Seen any driver beaming studies?

I'd like to be able to see where different size drivers start beaming, and at what point it becomes 'severe'. I've noticed that it starts gradually, but then changes more rapidly, hence my wanting to see actual data. My ideal set of info would show me a 10" driver, an 8", 6" and 4", at angles up to 90deg off axis (all done by the same person). Sometimes mfrg datasheets show a couple of angles, but that isn't enough to do a good comparison.

I'd like to cut a hole in the side of my house, and do it myself, but I don't think that would be 'allowed'. Maybe the roof?


EDIT: maybe it needs stating - measurements should be on an 'infinite' baffle

Last edited by cuibono; 20th November 2009 at 04:15 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 05:06 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Robh3606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
There are old nomographs for the -6db point based in driver diameter. You can also do simulations in some software as well. The first attachement is an old JBL graph the second an 8" JBL 2118 directivity graph generated in LEAP

Rob
Attached Images
File Type: jpg -6db points.jpg (99.8 KB, 237 views)
File Type: jpg 2118 Polar Resize.jpg (146.7 KB, 235 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 07:35 PM   #3
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks for the nomographs, Rob. There was also an Altec paper from the 70s (IIRC) that talked about this. Can't find it tho...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 08:13 PM   #4
cuibono is offline cuibono  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cuibono's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
Yeah, thanks, that is useful. I wonder to what degree it is accurate?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 08:17 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Saturnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Robh, I think the nomograph along with many other studies is NDA from JBLs development department.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 09:20 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Robh3606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
Quote:
Rob. There was also an Altec paper from the 70s (IIRC)
Not sure if this is the same one, thanks for reminding me. I have several of these I downloaded a couple of years ago.

Rob

Directivity - Lansing Heritage Forums
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th November 2009, 11:21 PM   #7
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Ron E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Google for ARPE - Asymmetrical Response Pattern Estimator
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 12:23 AM   #8
cuibono is offline cuibono  United States
diyAudio Member
 
cuibono's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
Lots of good info, thanks! I've realized SoundEasy also does polar pattern prediction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 12:29 AM   #9
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Yes Rob, that's the one. Altec Technical Letter no. 237.
Thanks for finding it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 01:12 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
A bit off topic, but what are the reasons for avoiding 'beaming'?

When I first started here, I asked about a 2 way design with an 8 inch midbass, and beaming was sighted as a possible issue. I've heard mention of off-axis response suffering from this phenomenon, and that can erode imaging, is that correct?

I'm confused as some call 12 inch drivers as 'mid-bass' and sight the narrowed dispersion as a positive. Is this a case of two different system goals and two schools of thought?

Jim
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
beaming? with a large Full range with wizzer pforeman Full Range 0 10th May 2009 01:34 AM
beaming? with a large Full range with wizzer pforeman Full Range 0 10th May 2009 01:24 AM
What exactly is beaming and why does it matter? paulspencer Multi-Way 101 13th June 2006 12:29 AM
Is beaming affected by volume? Cal Weldon Multi-Way 4 13th November 2005 01:46 PM
Test studies the_wonderchild The Lounge 0 7th August 2004 02:10 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Page generated in 0.11020 seconds (76.92% PHP - 23.08% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio