|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Hello,
I would like to contribute with my short study on loudspeaker distortion Measurement of speaker distortion Cheers, Pavel |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Place in the Netherlands
|
First of all, thanks for your efforts!
Do you have an estimate spl level for 0.6 Vrms (my guess would be < 85 dB for your speaker, which is rather low for speaker testing). The 2 Vrms are more representative. Can the surprising 19 kHz + 20 kHz measurement be hampered by the extension of your measurement mic? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Hi Taco,
thanks for your reply. You are right, 2Vrms is more realistic, but frankly speaking I do not listen at higher levels. The speaker has above 90dB/2.83Vrms/1m sensitivity. I was surprised by the 19+20kHz result for the reason that I expected much higher distortion (we can see 1kHz 2nd harmonic product and 18kHz 3rd harmonic product about 60dB below basic level, which is 6dB above 19 and 20kHz spectral line). The decaying shape of spectrum background is a 1/f noise of microphone and microphone preamp. Last edited by PMA; 2nd November 2009 at 06:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Even 85 dB is pretty loud.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
You made a huge error in your asumptions. The form of the nonlinearity for an amplifier may be completely different than for a loudspeaker, resulting in a situation where .1 % THD in the amp is audible on a loudspeaker with 10% THD. This makes it very difficult to draw any conclusions from you tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Hi Earl,
there might be a misunderstanding, I agree with you. I wanted to say that distortion of a current speaker may be quite low (and low order, as shown). There are many amplifiers, especially 'exotic' designs, that distort much more, and it is audible (like SE triode power amp - very very audible with philharmonic orchestra, though appreciated by many). The system I use for measurement (and listening) has all the distortion components below -100dB at 2Vrms. Power amplifier is no global NFB, 1A idle current design. Regards, Pavel |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: City of Angles
|
Thanks Pavel for sharing - I'm not surprised by your results - having non-linear distortion down 60dB is not too hard to do for modern drivers, particularly at the levels you've driven them at.
I agree with a general statement that nonlinear distortion is less audible in loudspeakers than many people assume. Toole's recent book has an interesting analysis of nonlinear distortion in loudspeakers. The upshot is that auditory masking limits our ability to hear harmonic tones. I would also add that any natural instrument has many harmonics that are just as loud as the fundamental, and would mask nonlinear distortion in loudspeakers, up to a point. Stored energy and crossover distortion are areas that may matter more, but that is still a fairly gray area IMO.
__________________
double complete rainbow all the way!! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka
|
Partly, IMO. They should not be completely overlooked or ignored. And we are not speaking numbers, but spectra. They are just a part of a whole issue.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Do you have a sample of an SE to try? Based on dim memories of the form of transfer functions which generate 2nd I never saw an obvious reason for discounting the possibility of second order cancellation between electronics and speakers. If you're set up it would make an interesting experiment. An option is to pre-distort the test signal with different percentages of second and graph the results.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OP-amp distortion measurement | CJ900RR | Chip Amps | 0 | 21st February 2009 10:06 AM |
| MP3 player distortion measurement [shocking!] | Limhes | Digital Source | 23 | 5th October 2007 03:10 PM |
| Heath Distortion Measurement Set HD-1 | TubesRulz | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 28th March 2005 07:44 PM |
| distortion measurement | djdamix | Solid State | 1 | 20th August 2004 07:11 AM |
| distortion measurement | audiobot | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 23rd January 2004 12:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10687 seconds (82.52% PHP - 17.48% MySQL) with 11 queries |