|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: athens greece
|
I WOULD LIKE to hear some serious thoughts about a big full range WMTMWdiy loudspeaker,with top hi-end drivers,using a compination of two worlds,the bottom woofer and midrange will be in a sealed box,and the upper mid and woofer will be in open baffle,i never saw a design like that i am thinking to build.Any strong recomentations for a woofer (12" or more) ,an excellent mid and a fine tweeter?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
I am about to build a 3 way with the bass driver in a box and the mid and top in an OB.
I will be using the Seas Exotic W8 and T35 (not OB) and JBL 15" bass drivers. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: athens greece
|
We well know that a woofer driver sealed in a box delivers stronger bass than a woofer in an open baffle,but the later operates in a more natural free way that eliminates the boxiness,the same occurs for the midrange drivers,so why not make a compination of both worlds?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Yeah, but you still have the supposed boxiness using closed bass and mid
Are you suggesting that additional non boxed drivers will elliminate the boxiness on hand Well, there might be some out phasing going on, but I have no idea about what will happen exactly |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
You could build a U or H frame for the woofer section, that may partially help the boxiness. then go OB for the rest?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SiliconValley
|
SB29RDC tweeter ~ $50
compromise: it's not a dipole like some ribbons Tang Band W6-1721 ~ $80 DIPOLE MIDRANGE compromise: some rear dipole block from large motor AE Speakers IB15 ~$125 DIPOLE WOOFER compromise: 85db efficiency - need to parallel and boost with separate amp Last edited by LineSource; 25th October 2009 at 06:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Those look nice
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SiliconValley
|
Tang Band W6-1721 with 0.5 Qts is suited for dipole midbass.
AE Speakers IB15 appears capable of low frequency dipole bass with a tall WMTMW baffle. Two in parallel ~ 92db/watt Fs: 16Hz Qms: 6.8 Vas: 439L Cms: .45mm/N Mms: 220g Rms: 3.239 Xmax: 18.5mm Xmech: 25mm Sd: 830sqcm Vd: 3.07L (p-p) Qes: .78 Re: 5.5ohm Le: .33mH Bl:12.49 Pe: 500W Qts: .7 1WSPL: 86dB 2.83V: 87.3dB I do not know of a dipole tweeter that sounds as good as the SB29 dome. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| WMTMW Open Baffles | Magnetar | Multi-Way | 47 | 14th November 2007 02:20 AM |
| Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] | keithpeter | Full Range | 10 | 11th September 2007 07:59 PM |
| Modelling a semi-open-baffle in WinISD for use with a sealed-box woofer? | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th November 2006 09:49 PM |
| Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) | tktran | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th November 2004 11:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09815 seconds (76.55% PHP - 23.45% MySQL) with 11 queries |