|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Yeah, it's funny, because I bypassed the speaker connections to where they connect to the board, but because they were still connected, I merely eliminated the possibility of bad soldering, not a total short, which I hadn't considered as it did seem totally impossible looking from the inside of the box, as both terminals were on an insulated plate. Doh! It does seem a bit weird for Celestion to put their speaker terminals onto an aluminium id plate with only cardboard washers to protect their tiny crappy connectors from meeting the plate.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Midlands
|
Unfortunately after Engineers have designed working Prototypes,
those get taken to Marketing Departments where the Visual Priorities are decided, such as where to put the Company's label , etc ... AND, the Accounting Department ALWAYS wants least possible money spent, thus likely why the cardboard washers ! Cardboard is a good insulator, when dry and undamaged, and it seems no-one gave much thought to the Life Expectancy of this design, nor referred the finished selling product back to the Engineering Dept !! Now-a-days, as result of Consumer Safety Legislation, there are final checks done which would hopefully find the potential problem you have discovered. It is good that you have posted this, as other Celestion 44 restorers can replace those old washers ! ************************************************** *** There are some audio crossover suitable Bi-Polar electrolytics available. They have larger surge voltage capability than standard bi-polars which are made for solid-state electronics applications primarily now, thus are better for handling the peaks of loud audio signals. List the all Capacitance values that are in your cross-overs, and I'll Post the cheapest suitable replacements. However, as it seems you don't mind extending to ClarityCap prices for the treble circuit, such would be audibly beneficial in the midrange circuit also, but you decide, and state what you prefer to install ... ? Look carefully, as those Parallel connected black caps may not all be 2uF - some may be 1u5 or other values. Don't worry if there is no EXACT available cap value for the large Series connected cap in the mids' filter. Post what is there, and I'll recommend further. Are you buying via Mail Order - limited to UK only ? - or can to EU ? - or can to USA/Canada ? or only buying what you can find at a local over-the-counter retailer -{who ?}- ?
__________________
Alan Last edited by alan-1-b; 10th October 2009 at 05:34 PM. Reason: to add a sentance |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Thanks once again Alan. Well, now Lorian and I each have a pair of Ditton 44s, both with replaced speaker connectors, and now working very well.
Personally speaking, I'd like to replace the caps, because I think that the cost is justified by the potential improvement. I know that electrolytic caps, and probably other types too, have an insidious degradation, that is hard to notice, but when replaced after 40 years, should take the speakers a leap back up to original spec. ![]() From what I read, the mids and treble caps (C1, C5 & C6 on this photo) are much more critical for quality polypropylene caps, as they are on the + side of the drivers, filtering out the bass, whereas the others are on the return from the drivers and so can be served with electrolytics without any degradation of sound whatsoever. Is that about right? I interpreted that from this quote I read: "When it comes to high-pass filters, the best-sounding capacitors are the high-voltage Mylar and polypropylene variety. (They're also the most expensive.) With low-pass filters, however, you can use any type of capacitor – it's the type of inductor that counts." Last edited by LucasAdamson; 10th October 2009 at 11:00 PM. Reason: Inserting a photo (again) |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I would NEVER use any other than film caps, anywhere
Though I admit even the cheapest ones are awfully expencive when BIG And Im not into expencive stuff either, just use what sounds good, and dont let the price influence your judgement in any way Fore inductors, use only wire wound air core when possible No need to use very thick wire either, unless you have problems with lack of control NEVER use standard iron powder core Find some good toroid core, if you need them big ones Fore internal wire, just use ordinary cheap close to costing zero single solid core copper And not too thick ones either Yeah, many will agree But a word of caution The sound may change a lot, and maybe not even to your liking When changing components, other adjustments may be needed too Best I can say, dont overdo it Im sure very many people hear miracle effects from certain components because they change the sound in a way that compensates for a flawed design, mostly crossover related So, in many cases when a certain component is suggested as being better, it could easily be very different when used in any other design And the point of all this? the "best" is not always the bette choise But dont let that scare you Last edited by tinitus; 10th October 2009 at 11:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Good to hear it is sorted. nice to know I was on the right track when I said it could be a short, just targeting the wrong spot
![]() If you want some polyprops that should do the job without breaking the bank you could look at jarcars polyproylene caps They also have a range of electros suitable for crossovers for the larger values They only have polyprops up to 10uf, but that will do you for most of the values you would need. certainly in the mid + tweeter section where it is probably more critical. (A bit under 13 pouds for 2 X 10 and a 4.7 would get you pretty close to your 25uf one (tolerances aside). The big electros in the low pass I'd personally just leave as electros... will start getting expensive to replace them with film caps! There are caps available in film up to values close to that big but they are VERY expensive Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#27 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
These film caps are ok, and affordable
http://frequence-shop.dk/produkter/39-pca-caps/ I know, not all what I wrote was aimed directly at you, but just a very short summary of what I would consider sensible fore a highend design Anyway, IF you wanted to use the much better aircore inductors, a "meter" fore measureing caps and inductors is still affordable, maybe around 100GBP A thing I couldnt do without and use a lot OFC copper? nah, just strip ordinary wire fore house wireing. Maybe just look in a container, and its free Just remember, just a single wire fore each driver terminal lug. DONT be tempted to twist multiple wires, and avoid very thick ones Last edited by tinitus; 11th October 2009 at 12:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Those Danish caps are quite cheap. I am still concerened that it is not necessary to use anything fancy for the stage after the driver, as with the bass speaker. 2x 72uf caps per speaker is still a lot of money. I might consider air core inductors in the future, but for now, I just want to return the speakers close to their original sound. Also, I have a question: Can these bass return caps really be 72uf? They are so small, physically! Is that a realistic value? I thought it might be more like 7.2 or even .72 considering the physical size. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Check out this datasheet for the specs on some random non-polar electros I found through RS-Components. the 100uf 50V has dimensions of 10mm X 16mm (they didn't have a 72uF).. Tony. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover nightmare...... | barackuda | Multi-Way | 11 | 19th October 2009 08:47 AM |
| Crossover Nightmare/Sleepless Nights | ChrisR1983 | Multi-Way | 5 | 2nd September 2009 08:59 AM |
| SI nightmare | gvr4ever | Class D | 16 | 20th September 2006 05:20 AM |
| New Nightmare (Guitar Amp) | Trout | Tubes / Valves | 48 | 27th November 2005 03:33 PM |
| Cartridge nightmare's | pete.a | Analogue Source | 14 | 5th December 2003 04:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09276 seconds (73.01% PHP - 26.99% MySQL) with 11 queries |