|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
Mikee:
I don't know that the bass is really any smoother in a Double Chamber Reflex than in a conventional reflex, (ported). In fact, I have read that there is some small interference between the ports that might make the bass of the Double Chamber reflex slightly worse. Whether this is audible, I do not know. But the big benefit of the Double Chamber Reflex is that it cuts down even more on the Intermodulation Distortion in the midrange. And as you pointed out, distortion up there is much more audible than distortion in the bass. It is all well and good to take distortion measurements at 1 Watt. But if your woofer is going to carry both the bass and midrange, what do you think is happening to the delicate female voices while the woofer that carries them is going back and forth 1/8" or more, in order to produce the bass frequencies even at moderate power levels? Not pretty. After all, bass requires a lot of air to be moved-the midrnge frequencies significantly less so. The more the cone must move to produce bass, the more the midrange suffers from Intermodulation Distortion. There is no way around that, assuming the bass driver is carrying the midrange. I would go so far as to say that building a two way Double Chamber Reflex is akin to building a three way speaker with the bass driver of the 3 way crossing over two octaves above the port frequency. In other words, a 3 way with crossovers at 160 Hz and 2500 Hz is equivalent to a Double Chamber Reflex with a crossover of 2500 Hz. The only differences, I would think, would be slightly more distortion in the 40 Hz to 60 Hz range and less dispersion in the midrange, since the 3 way is likely to use a midrange driver smaller in diameter than the bass driver. Again, I have neither heard nor measured the Double Chamber Reflex. However, the formulas for excursion/IM distortion would indicate that is how it works.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
Quote:
probably my amp wil be about 0.5% anywys at moderate power-but i must try a bandpass sometime because they are different :P ..basshorn for jbl first..
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
Quote:
Quote:
bass horns
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
||
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
|
a double chamber, small transmission line:
http://tech-diy.com/LS_Articles.htm |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
Thanks, Jack. I have been interested in Dalines for some time.
Here is another thread that deals with Dalines. The subject was discussed from Post # 19 on. Dual Woofer TL?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Italy
|
Kelticwizard:
I am using a Focal 7k4412 and a ATD 135 ribbon tweeter. The cabinet is unfinished cause my intentions are to test it in ported way, then DCR, then try with the tweeter mounted on the top of the box in phase with the woofer( I already made a different front panel to switch with the one you see in the pic). It's a lot of work and a lot of time, and till now they are just playing with no damping in opposed phase: imagine the sound! What I believe DCR helps a lot is in diminishing standing waves in tall tower cabinet, like mine. Some impedence measures will tell me if it is the right way to go. Claudio |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dual Chamber Reflex Subwoofer Revisited | Hezz | Subwoofers | 14 | 26th February 2006 03:24 AM |
| Dual chamber ported sub? | elambert | Subwoofers | 12 | 18th May 2005 12:40 PM |
| Help on Dual Chamber Reflex box & car audio response Q's please (LONG) | beady | Car Audio | 7 | 6th August 2004 12:57 PM |
| Help on Dual Chamber Reflex box & car audio response Q's please (LONG) | beady | Multi-Way | 0 | 3rd August 2004 11:09 PM |
| Dual-Chamber Vented Boxes | BAM | Multi-Way | 9 | 2nd July 2004 02:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.21317410 seconds (79.20% PHP - 20.80% MySQL) with 11 queries |