|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
|
hi!
im begun embarking on my 3rd loudspeaker project, using visaton al130 woofer and gc20 tweeter. using winISD as a tool to try various tinkerings with Vb and ive ended up using Weems' book and come to a conclusion about box size. The only trouble is that to obtain a port with sufficient area to keep vent mach reasonable(ie 7-9%) the port is too long for the box , or at least it voilates the 3" from rear wall rule. considering using a slotted port so i can have a longer port of larger area...anyone have any input on this idea? Is it worth it ? currently the circular port required is 1.5" diameter which i consider too small for a 5.5" woofer. thanks for any advice Greg |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Flare the ends and it will be fine at 1.5"
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
If you want to use a bigger diameter port you can put a bend in it.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Its a 5"
Maybe it works better in closed Fore what its worth, with a 2" port I get a 200mm length Which I would also consider a bit long fore a 5" woofer Last edited by tinitus; 29th September 2009 at 10:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Silicon Valley & NYC
|
long ports are not the best idea for full range speakers ( as opposed to subwoofers ) because of the standing waves in the ports.
for non subwoofers i would avoid ports altogether but if ports must be used i would not use long ones. at least if the port is very short / small you can use damping material to reduce the energy available inside the speaker to excite its modes because the modes will be higher up where acoustical foam is effective. also the bigger the port the more it begins to look like a tube. a very small port looks more like a hole. a hole is less likely to sound like a tube than a tube |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
|
cool thanks all.
I was thinking that 1.5" pipe would be ok and maybe only a problem at ear bleedingly loud levels. Either way i agree, i think its better than a 3" pipe at some 12" long with a bend along its length to fit it in the box. oh and the EBP comes to about 95 so...NO i think its more suited to a vented design of some kind, although i have modelled a sealed design and response wouldnt be terrible...F3 at about 85Hz Qb of .7 in a 5 litre box...not bad but certainly not no LS3/5A.... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shape: Port recalculation? | electroaudio | Subwoofers | 2 | 8th March 2009 09:03 PM |
| Slot port vs circular port equivalence | Brisso57 | Multi-Way | 12 | 21st February 2009 02:38 PM |
| Single Port Vent Better than Dual Port? | Daveis | Multi-Way | 18 | 15th July 2007 05:12 AM |
| Port Shape and Size-Questions from a Newbie | dj_oatmeal | Full Range | 2 | 18th March 2007 10:04 PM |
| To port or not to port? Newbie with newly built mains | starquake | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th December 2004 12:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12042 seconds (57.90% PHP - 42.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |