|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
In a 3-way speaker with two pairs of connectors, what will be the best arrangement for those bi-wire (or bi-amp) connectors:
a) [Tweeter] + [Midrange and Woofer connected together] (T - MW) b) [Tweeter and Midrange connected together] + Woofer (TM - W) XO freqs. about 3500Hz and 200Hz. Thanks and regards Last edited by Sony; 1st September 2009 at 06:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hillsborough, NC/McLean, VA
|
I don't think bi-wiring is going to matter.
Bi-amping, on the other hand, can make a huge difference, although I assume you're staying with the passive Xovers as you listed the frequencies already. In that case, I'd run the tweets and midrange off the same channels, leaving the other 2 channels for the woofers.
__________________
Jim J. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
Yes, I have passive Xovers and I intend to passive bi-amp but since it's a 3-way, my doubt is which driver should be isolated - the tweeter or the woofer.
One one hand the woofer takes more power than the other two together, thus, if using equal amplifiers it would make sense to go for a tm + w configuration. On the other hand, if I go for a t + mw configuration, I can use a softer (and much weaker) amplifier on the tweeter alone, like one of those wonderful tube amps with very low power. What do you think? This isn't really a 3-way but a 2.5 one. The midrange (woofer in a sealed box) rolls naturally at 200Hz. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
if the 3way crossover has three inputs then consider tri-amping.
Alternatively bring the Extra crossover input to the outside for a third pair of terminals. Bi-wire two pair of terminals and bi-amp the final pair. Two amps driving three sets of wires. Try various arrangements and listen for any differences. I have found that bi-wiring gives a gain almost as much as adding the extra amplifier.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
Andrew, I understand your point. There's nothing like trying out several combinations. I was just trying a shortcut, as I planed it to only have a pair of terminals.
Have you noticed that most loudspeakers in the market nowdays, including most highend models, with 3 and sometimes 4 ways, only have two pairs of ports? In some cases previous models had more terminals but they reduced them to two pairs, even in much more expensive upgrades. Why will that happen? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
b) [Tweeter and Midrange connected together] + Woofer (TM - W) is the better arrangement, stops intermodulation distortion from the woofer
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wollongong
|
Keep in mind the fact that you may (probably will, actually) need to use a signal level crossover before the tweeter amp if you do this, otherwise you'll still amplify the low frequencies with the weak amplifier and severely drive it into clipping.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
PeteMck, given the midrange is also a woofer won't it present the same intermodulation distortion treath to the tweeter?
Stu, I believe the energy dissipated in the high-pass filter will be much less than the one that would be dissipated if the same amplifier was also connected to the other drivers (and filters). |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
The advantage that comes from bi-amplifying is due to the higher impedance presented to the amplifier by the half crossover.
Amplifiers generally perform better when driving higher impedances but the effect can be quite subtle when they are operating well within their load specification. If the amplifier is operating at near it's load impedance limit, then raising the load impedance will make a bigger difference to the final sound coming from the speaker. Both amplifiers are working with a wideband signal and both must be run within their voltage and current limits. This is no different from running a single amplifier into both parts of the crossover. You set your maximum volume to avoid clipping whether you are bi-amplifying or normal amplifying.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wollongong
|
Quote:
If you're considering bi-amping you might as well go all the way and cross over at the signal level. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| acoustst 2+1 biamp? | Williams Audio | Planars & Exotics | 8 | 30th July 2007 05:42 PM |
| biwire. change -ve leads and wow! | adamt | Multi-Way | 9 | 9th November 2006 08:28 PM |
| DIY Biamp project | docz | Full Range | 1 | 25th November 2004 07:50 PM |
| Biwire Jumper options?? | greg7 | Multi-Way | 2 | 1st June 2003 09:53 AM |
| To Biamp or not to Biamp, that is the question??????? | Apogee | Pass Labs | 70 | 12th July 2002 12:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.24903 seconds (38.05% PHP - 61.95% MySQL) with 10 queries |