|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
I have read and studied that the Zobel will create a flat impedence curve making the XO circuit perform as designed.
How do you decide if it is warranted to have a Zobel on either tweeter or woofer ? I would assume that if your XO point is suficiently high on the tweeter (above the resonance freq) then you may not need one? On the woofer, would you say that if you XO point is low enough such that there is little rise in the eimpedence at that point you can get away with out it ? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
The most compelling reason to use a zobel on a passive crossover network is to provide a flat impedance as seen by the amplifier. Especially with tube outputs with little to no feedback, performance of the amplifier is optimized with a flat impedance vs frequency.
That's my understanding. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Suppose I have a woofer whos impedence curve rises as the frequency rises (I think this is typical). Suppose that I choose an XO point far to the right within that area.
Also, suppose I have not used a Zobel circuit. What is the effect? Will volume increase as the frequency increases towards the XO point? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
I've never bothered to Zobel a woofer, just choose a woofer that doesn't have a skyrocketing impedance at resonance.
Now midtweeters can be a problem that most people overlook/ignore... you don't want an "near-unloaded" tubeamp at HF Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Zobels don't help with impedance rise at resonance, only the rise above resonance which is due to the inductance of the voicecoil.
You "decide" if it's warranted by looking/measuring the impedance curve and acoustic output and playing about with the crossover.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
|
I thought the Zobel was to help keep the amp stable by ensureing a more constant load for the amp. So if you remove the Zobel your amp might start ringing or even go into oscillation and burn up.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As has been mentioned before, a zobel network is used to counteract the impedance rise created by the inductance of the voice coil.
A zobel network is basically another tool a designer has available to help them to shape the acoustic output of the driver via the crossover. If you need one or not depends on the driver/s being used. That being said, textbook crossover calculators assume a perfectly flat impedance and perfectly flat frequency response. If you were working with a wide bandwidth driver that was reasonably flat.. http://www.tymphany.com/832873 ..one of those for example. And you decided you wanted your crossover frequency to be at 2khz. Obviously this drivers frequency response extends well beyond that point. If you were to put a text book 4th order electrical slope into practice, you'd end up reasonably close to your desired 4th order acoustic goal. But you can go one step further and that's to apply a zobel network across the drivers terminals. The effect will be to flatten the drivers rising impedance thus making the text book crossover see the impedance it was designed to work with as well as a flat frequency response, getting you one step closer to your goal.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
What are the negatives of using the zobel ?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zobel Or No Zobel ? | sakis | Solid State | 74 | 2nd March 2012 09:32 AM |
| which cap do you like in zobel ? | sandro600 | Solid State | 2 | 28th January 2007 10:36 AM |
| zobel | Streets97f | Subwoofers | 4 | 19th November 2006 04:44 AM |
| the zobel | bigpanda | Solid State | 9 | 13th May 2006 03:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10487 seconds (79.55% PHP - 20.45% MySQL) with 11 queries |