|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
When tweeking a higher order xover, what is the effect of changing only C and not L in a tweeter circuit? I know there are formulas for determining the values of each component. Is there a means to evaluate what changes in value of one component might have on the overall filter action? Must both C and L be changed? Say I have a slight dip in response at 2k that I believe can be raised by slightly lowering the corner of the tweeter filter. If I add a small cap in parallel without adjusting the inductor in a 2nd order xover, will that be bad? Will it move the corner of the filter or simply goof up the slope or something else? Is there any way to predict how much the response might change for a given amount of added C? Should I take the trouble to change the inductor proportionately? Tougher to do that!
Peace, Tom E |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Hi
Sounds like you need a free copy of Linear Technologies Spice program. That's what I use when I start to wonder what if. added link http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/ you could copy this 2 way xover to get started http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...43#post1870843
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hamilton, victoria
|
Often wondered that myself!
By changing values, there is always a different sound, dunno about you but I always have trouble putting a finger on 'what just happened to that response'! A prog that could predict this would help alot. I think I know what I just heard, but never really sure why!
__________________
Making stuff 'idiot proof', Just breeds more effective idiots.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Predicting the effect of changing baffle dimensions? | HeatMiser | Multi-Way | 4 | 8th March 2006 07:56 PM |
| changing x/o from L&R 2nd order to 3d order | busterno1 | Multi-Way | 0 | 22nd April 2005 10:09 AM |
| Higher order crossovers is it possible with LM4780? | diysmartdeep21 | Chip Amps | 0 | 10th February 2005 12:17 PM |
| Is it true that the higher the BL of a subwoofer, the higher its lowest playable... | 454Casull | Subwoofers | 16 | 19th March 2004 04:28 PM |
| Super-power amps - higher current better than higher voltage | Circlotron | Solid State | 34 | 28th June 2002 04:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |