|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Hey,
I'm looking to do a new design I've been working on for a Scanspeak 9700 and Scanspeak 8545. I'm trying to get help designing a crossover but right now have been looking at the Madisound Solist as a possibility. I would like to customize my own crossover with my local tech (but must get a basic idea of what I wanna work off of) any suggestions would be appreciated! I am looking to make my monitor based off the dimensions of the Pro Ac Studio 100. These components are essentially an upgrade on that model's. (8543 and Scanspeak 9500 modified by ProAc) ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Hello,
It is not an easy task for a beginner. This job was well done by Troëls : http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Amish_8545_9500.htm |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
I've seen this. thank you.
My speaker is going to be significantly smaller will the Solist crossover not work correctly for this set up? I believe it is designed for the same combination 9700 and 8543 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
A good crossover is developed for a chosen set of drivers AND a chosen enclosure. For the enclosure the baffle width and the placement of the drivers are important, so I think that if you use the amish (8545+9700) crossover, and you retain the baffle width, and the placement of the drivers (from the top of the baffle), you are (more or less) safe. With a smaller enclosure you will have to change the bass tuning.
Ralf |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
are both the Solist's crossover design and the Amish's a 3k Crossover?
I'd be interested to know what you'd suggest as an alternative. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
See Amish revisited, better crossover, 2.3kHz crossover frequency.
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Amish.htm Other alternative 7"+1" SEAS Zaph ZR71 : http://www.zaphaudio.com/SR71.html Scanspeak S101M : http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Studio101.htm DAYTON modula MT : http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=13154 VIFA http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/PL18XT.htm |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
deckerluke, you may try to contact this person
http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spkrbldg/ I've seen some threads on this forum, where he helped people designing crossovers. I have not heard any of his designs, but by looking at his final responce curves and from some of my own experience with same drivers, I'd say his designs are quite good. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
is the Solist's crossover also 3 k
what about the Pro Ac 100's? I can post the image so you can take a look.. Will contact Jay's diy lab, thanks for all the help! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS/FT Scanspeak 8545 and 9700 | rtenyes | Swap Meet | 17 | 11th February 2011 12:38 AM |
| What to do with scanspeak 9500 and 8545 drivers? | waltona | Multi-Way | 7 | 25th March 2009 02:22 AM |
| FS: ScanSpeak 18W/8545-00 (pair) | mac | Swap Meet | 2 | 1st July 2008 01:50 PM |
| WTB: Scanspeak 8545 woofers, tweeters | ssmith | Swap Meet | 5 | 9th March 2007 10:18 AM |
| FS: Scanspeak 8545 Perfect Quad & SS 9900 | Oris642 | Swap Meet | 1 | 27th September 2003 09:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 4.36874 seconds (2.89% PHP - 97.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |