|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#161 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
|
I still believe one should specify between pro sound reinforcement and pro studio speakers, ever see Genelecs at a concert or horns with a 60 degree dispersion in a studio? Check out Meyer Sounds products
Meyer Sound Sales One big advantage (pun intended) is size, Ive never seen home speakers with 2 18" woofers per side (although they probably exsist), I have seen them in a studio control room. |
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
I have total 4 18" woofers in my living room
In the "heyday", I got 6 in total, 2 per L-C-R or 3 per side As to the 'studio' vs 'sound reinforcement' things, I believe they are different in system design, but at the 'component' level, I think many things (if not all) should be the same. ps. I live in relatively small apartment and don't listen very loud, but still prefer pro-stuff |
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
|
I still believe that higher end manufactures use different drivers in these 2 very different applications. Live sound needs extreme efficiency, ruggedness (electrically, pyhsically, and enviromentally), and directionality (ever see dome tweters at concerts?), studios want very low distortion, and flat extended freq resp. (sure they want spl, but thats not so hard to do these days in small rooms with large drivers). Go look at Meyer Sounds different products for these applications, they use different drivers.
And I dont work for Meyer but I have worked with the HD-1s for many years. They seem to be an inovative research based (using science and measurements) design and manufacturing company. Last edited by cbdb; 4th November 2009 at 05:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
In my very limited experience designing my Onken/Ultraflex based system (see old Onken threads for details) I currently use I would have to say I would have to agree with Gedlees comments and observations as they seem to parallel mine. I' m using a mix of vintage and current pro sound drivers in my system, and the effortless quality of reproduction is something I never heard in any of the several commercial speaker systems I've owned or had on a long term loan. (AR58LS, MG1.4, MG1.6QR, Silverline Sonatinas, etc..)
In a former job I got to be well acquainted with the effects of dynamic compression due to voice coil heating and got to measure it. It could easily kill 3dB or more of dynamic range when the VC got hot. Pro drivers can be very linear at the limited excursions and power levels encountered in home use. The combination of Iconic and JBL drivers in my system offers relatively decent FR flatness +/-2dB 100Hz - 10kHz and within -3dB limits from 35Hz - 16kHz (excluding a few peaks and dips below 100Hz) considering the lack of room treatment, no traps or EQ of any kind and my unsophisticated X-O design - not a bad result. As far as the sound goes, I got really lucky - this was my first speaker project and an extremely ambitious one. Edit: As a further comment, the systems of friends I most like are all cinema/large format horn (some reflex on the bottom end) based systems. You haven't heard "big" sound until you've heard a pair of RCA Ubangis in the right room..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net Last edited by kevinkr; 4th November 2009 at 05:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Remind us exactly how much experience you have with designing with and measuring pro drivers for use in domestic systems. Drivers and application used would be a good start.
|
|
|
|
|
#168 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
I for one would love to know what you have in mind. Last edited by smokinghot; 4th November 2009 at 09:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
I am also willing to hear your experiences and see your measurements of pro drivers and indicate exactly why they are unsuitable for domestic reproduction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
According to my own experiences, I think it doesn't need any sophisticated measure instrument or design skills to reveal the superiority of pro-drivers.
Just hook them up and play! Just drivers, aren't they? Why prejudice? Is it because they are bigger and uglier? They won't bite, don't worry! Facing those so-called 'Hi-Fi' / 'Hi-end' drivers, pro-drivers just win, hands down, no contest. I don't know why I'm wasting time typing here.... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fitting drivers in cylinders pros & cons | 56oval | Multi-Way | 5 | 24th February 2009 01:30 AM |
| pros/cons of a 845 VS 211 | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 18th June 2007 01:57 PM |
| TL vs MLTL, pros and cons | Tomac | Multi-Way | 5 | 29th December 2004 01:55 PM |
| Filterless DAC - pros and cons? | mr_push_pull | Digital Source | 1 | 11th August 2004 03:56 PM |
| Pros and Cons of this technique? | G | Tubes / Valves | 35 | 23rd October 2003 06:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13128 seconds (81.68% PHP - 18.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |