|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Can a single point source be identified in a sphere ?
E=MC2 helps a lot but doesn't help me to find the answer. The project is to put several drivers on each face of a polyhedron , to guarantee a correct sound reproduction and not to cause interference between drivers. These shall be low power tiny tweeters connected serial-parallel ,if the average impedances available on the market are used . Anyone has experience on this ? What should be the polyhedron -or mix of different- form? For a start ,I choose for simplicity to place 6 drivers , but I suspect their number can rise . edit>A sphere would also be a good choice... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Just waiting for someone to say:
"yeah, stick a dozen of mean tweeters to that soccer ball you have!" |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I've made quite a few in the early seventies used as center attractor speakers hanged from the ceiling at ear height. A plastic 15 cm diameter ball could accommodate 24 Seas 2” 5 TV HF-8 cone tweeter drivers that only could be used above 5 kHz. If I remember right, using this sphere size and the mentioned speaker placement: It was impossible to locate any of the individual drivers at the listeners sweet spot . Some thoughts concerning the size and more : Se picture 1(1) b 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
well..Thanks Bjorno. Your interest brought me to some thoughts:
Modern drivers with soft dome would perform much better It's not a PA installation , so once made a prototype ,peaks and dips could be corrected via proper cells in the crossover. Yes , the size is right ! about 10-15 cm is where I'm moving to ,placed on the top of the cabinet that accomodates the woofer MAA must be Mutual Acoustic Amplification , right? I was concerned only in possible diffractions that would lend to "beaming",so analisying only one channel without verifying the centering of a stereo image would be ok. The sphere is avoided.I'm thinking of strange sums of polyhedrons,with a very scary look! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why not a ribbon tweeter instead of a horn tweeter? | Curly Woods | Full Range | 9 | 15th July 2009 04:09 PM |
| Tweeter help for Miller & Kreisell Tweeter 17500 | merajsalek | Multi-Way | 4 | 3rd September 2008 03:41 AM |
| Linaeum Dipole Tweeter as a Super tweeter? | ktuuri | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 17th June 2008 06:52 PM |
| motor types head to head for a TT | p_ete2003 | Analogue Source | 20 | 11th January 2007 08:29 PM |
| Titanium tweeter vs Ribbon tweeter | goldyrathore | Multi-Way | 14 | 17th May 2004 07:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07629 seconds (78.38% PHP - 21.62% MySQL) with 11 queries |