Doug's Abbey build (with veneer)

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi Doug,

Got your email. Can see everything clearly now. It is a beauty you got there. Think if I am getting the Abbey (working hard on it, cooking nice dinner, take rubbish out etc), I'll veneer it like you. Not sure if I'll be able to get the veneer and baffle join look as nicely as yours. It look tricky to me.
As for the foam plug, I actually prefer the bulge look. I am sure the 3D look do add to the 3D sound. :spin:
You mention that you would avoid using shellac based sealer the next time. Will oil base prime be a good alternative if brush priming it?

Thanks for sharing.
Sam

The best primer that I have found is the epoxy. I use water based, but once its dried you can paint anything over it. Its very hard and sand well. Shellac, Bins, are good, but not suitable under some top coats.

Doug did a trick at the edge which I had thought of. Cut a thin grove all along the joint between the baffle and the sides. Then you paint this and trim the veneer to it. That makes a nice joint.
 
Hi Earl,
Good tips..
Don't mind if I ask a few more question. What is the roundover router bits size, is it 1/2" or bigger? Well, other than the top and bottom panel, the side panel that join the top/bottom need to be routed as well?

Thanks :)

I use 1". The Abbey is routed on all sides, while the Harper just the front and its 3/4" The Nathan doesn't do the bottom. The front baffle is essential, the sides less so.
 
Hi Doug,

Got your email. Can see everything clearly now. It is a beauty you got there. Think if I am getting the Abbey (working hard on it, cooking nice dinner, take rubbish out etc), I'll veneer it like you. Not sure if I'll be able to get the veneer and baffle join look as nicely as yours. It look tricky to me.
As for the foam plug, I actually prefer the bulge look. I am sure the 3D look do add to the 3D sound. :spin:
You mention that you would avoid using shellac based sealer the next time. Will oil base prime be a good alternative if brush priming it?

Thanks for sharing.
Sam

Making the groove at the join between the baffle and sides allows a nice clean trim of the veneer edge, as Earl also mentioned. If I were going to do it without grill cloth, I would fill the groove after trimming the veneer and applying 2-3 coats of finish to it (you do have to be very careful at the trimming stage - I used a single edge razor blade to do the trimming). To fill the groove, I would mask off the veneer edge with painter's tape, glue in a filler strip (you might also want to make the groove narrower than I did) and fill the cracks with some wood putty or maybe a synthetic filler.

I would not prime or finish the baffle before veneering and filling the groove. That way you should be able to sand everything flush and get a nice clean line between the baffle and sides (you will probably have apply new tape after sanding the edge - maybe even more than once). If you happen to cut though the finish at the veneer edge it shouldn't matter since you will have to apply additional coats of finish anyway. Once you have a few coats of finish on the veneer it should be easy to get a nice clean mask line with the tape (just press really hard at the edge). Alternatively, you could fill the groove with a contrasting hardwood, or even a metal strip - something I considered - but this might be more challenging than the masking approach.

The main issue I had with my finishing approach was leaching out of the water-soluble dyes I used for staining with the shellac undercoats. If I did it again I would just use multiple coats of a good polyurethane finish (I like the General Finishes stuff) instead of shellac + poly. I did this on the stands I made and they came out very nicely, using the same stain. I was probably conservative in my choice of woods as well. With practice it would probably be possible to bend a wider variety of woods around those corners. You could practice using some 2" PVC pipe. Veneer softener may help although I found I didn't need it.

Hope that helps -

- Doug
 
No I didn't, but it's an interesting idea... probably not possible though because of the size of the waveguide (impossible to reach the screws at the top). Also, there might not be enough to hold on to since the back panel is only 1/2" thick at the edges. The way it is now, the screws are holding onto ~3/4" if solid oak.

-Doug
 
Flat head machine screws epoxied in before veneering the back might work as studs - I would worry about stress on the veneer when tightening though. Then threaded spacers on the inside to make it easy to get a grip on them with an open end or socket wrench.

No big deal - just a thought.

Pete B.

Whats the issue with visible screws on the back? The ones on the front are an issue to me, but not the ones on the back.
 
Well, they are visible when you walk by, the way I have mine set up. I knew they were going to be, so I tried to make them as insignificant as possible when I built them, but in a perfect world I suppose they would be either invisible or absent. I think it is good to be able to take off the back easily, though, and I wouldn't want to have to remove the grill cloth, woofer and fill just to do that.

- Doug
 
Whats the issue with visible screws on the back? The ones on the front are an issue to me, but not the ones on the back.

I think Doug answered this.

It looks a bit dated, since 99/100 modern commercial speakers do not have screws showing on the back. Think about it ... furniture does not have screws showing either. I'd have an access panel on the bottom if at all - I've done this before. Even sometimes put the input panel down there. However, it seems you need rear access to the horn in this design.

Pete B.
 
I think Doug answered this.

It looks a bit dated, since 99/100 modern commercial speakers do not have screws showing on the back. Think about it ... furniture does not have screws showing either. I'd have an access panel on the bottom if at all - I've done this before. Even sometimes put the input panel down there. However, it seems you need rear access to the horn in this design.

Pete B.

There is no way to mount the compression driver except from the back. And when I change the woofer to mount from the back - so that ITS screws don't show, then the entire back will have to be open to achieve this. MOST speakers are built for appearance first and function second. When you put function first, then there are some compromises that might have to be made for appearance. Everything is negotiable. The screws on the back could be elliminated, its simply a matter of cost.
 
Nice web site Doug.

For me I like to see the foam and the waveguide exit. I've come to dislike seeing the screws on the woofer and thats why the assembling is going to change to hide them. I think that this will improve the looks a great deal. Then I wouldn't even consider a total grill cloth and no foam cutting would be necessary. This is the better approach IMO.

Any updates on hiding the screws on the woofer?


I have hated that forever with many speakers.
 
Well, they are visible when you walk by, the way I have mine set up. I knew they were going to be, so I tried to make them as insignificant as possible when I built them, but in a perfect world I suppose they would be either invisible or absent. I think it is good to be able to take off the back easily, though, and I wouldn't want to have to remove the grill cloth, woofer and fill just to do that.

- Doug

If they can't be invisible or absent, and it is functionally better to have them, FLAUNT them.

You can get some nice decorative brass screws and washers like these:

Decorative Washers - Rockler Woodworking Tools
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.