|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Hello all!
"Alex of Raal" built a speaker some time ago (I donīt know whether it is regularly sold now) with an innovative bass section that featured a cube standing on a corner with drivers on five sides. http://www.6moons.com/industryfeatur...rbia/raal.html I am considering a cube standing on an edge with four drivers. Has anyone here veryfied this concept? My goal is less boosting than in a flat baffle and no need for a notch like in a ripole. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
That's an omni not a dipole.
It should sound a lot like your room, the opposite of a dipole. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Sorry, I forgot to mention that one side of the Raal bass is open. So is the rear of my concept.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
If you mean a 5-sided box then it'll surely work, under a certain frequency of course. And it looks great
I've once built an open back 5-sided box in an ordinary rectangular shape which has 2 pairs of parallel walls. There're some nasty resonance peaks somewhere in mid to midbass which could not be damped effectly by stuffings. Of course the damping materials work to some extent but the annoying "box sound" can not be completely suppressed. So I'd avoid such construction in or near the midrange. And what about the front surface of the box? Just a plain board? Or put on another driver? Ah! that will break the perfect force-cancellation. Playing with some stuffing tricks, maybe you'll get a cardioid response. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
How about this, 3-sided and standing on one of the tips:
![]() 3* 8-Ohm woofers connected in parallel yields a 2.67 Ohm load. In narrow band application (subwoofer) it should be fine. And you'll need some frameworks on the rear side for overall rigidness. Or just see it as a framed cube without 3 of the surfaces. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dipole bass or Ripole Bass? | MJL21193 | Subwoofers | 13 | 15th September 2008 07:42 AM |
| Sideways Dipole Bass | sdclc126 | Multi-Way | 18 | 4th December 2007 12:28 AM |
| dipole stereo bass? | xstephanx | Subwoofers | 63 | 1st June 2006 12:19 PM |
| Some dipole bass measurements | John Sheerin | Multi-Way | 19 | 3rd January 2005 06:48 AM |
| dipole bass help | amo | Multi-Way | 11 | 17th September 2003 06:06 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09360 seconds (64.26% PHP - 35.74% MySQL) with 11 queries |