Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th June 2009, 06:40 PM   #1
Elbert is offline Elbert  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default Scanpeerless 104 DT tweeter??

Hmm.. whats going on??

Not to long, Peerless (tymphany) announced a new "top of the line" tweeter the HDS 104 DT.

http://www.tymphany.com/810921

A very nice looking unit by the way..

This was also tested by Zaph and received very positive remarks.

Was just browsing through the Scanspeak web-page, in particular their new discovery-series..

And what do I see??

http://www.tymphany.com/810921

Is this new tweeter a made-in-Denmark Scanspeak tweeter, or is it a china- made Tymphany??

If this is really a proper Scanspeak quality tweeter, I'm buying, 'cause the price is not bad...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 07:09 PM   #2
Dansk is offline Dansk  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
If you buy it as a ScanSpeak tweeter it's made in denmark. If you buy it as a Tymphany (Peerless) tweeter it's made in china. Apart from that it's the exact same unit. - I'm not kidding
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 07:13 PM   #3
Elbert is offline Elbert  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Really??

Is the price different too?

Somehow I would feel better knowing it was made in Denmark..
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 07:22 PM   #4
Dansk is offline Dansk  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
I believe the price is different, yes. You'll probably be able to guess, which is the most expensive...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 07:33 PM   #5
Elbert is offline Elbert  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Well, Same design, different factories.. would be interesting to know the story behind this deal, hehe!

Will be interesting to see what the actual difference in price will be..

Assuming it is exactly the same design and manufacturing process and quality control similar, it would make sense to buy a Chinese Tymphany unit.. But then again, something doesn't ring quite true about a "made in China" Scanspeak...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 08:57 PM   #6
Dansk is offline Dansk  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Well, as much as I my self love the ScanSpeak units, I don't think I have ever heard of any serious production quality problems related to the units from Vifa and Peerless, that has been built in China.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 09:15 PM   #7
Elbert is offline Elbert  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
No, I would expect Tymphany/ Peerless to excercise tight control over their products so as not to risk their brand-name.. but it's a bit like when BMW took over Rolls Royce.. or jaguar was bought by the Indians.. still the same but not quite the same still..

Irrational as it may seem, I think we all have to admit that to some extent, hi-fi is not only about listening to music, but also the pride and joy of owning and using nice and well-reputable equipment.. perhaps even more so today in this world of globalization when brands and products are becoming ever more dissociated...

Woha.. off on a tangent there.. Nevermind, has anyone seen this Scanspeakerized design up for sale anywhere yet by the way?
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 09:18 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
On Zaph's site, there have been some reported issues with the Peerless exclusive line of midwoofers - off-center phase plugs and some consistency issue across different batches.

Not enough to affect functionality, but definitely not a good thing.
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 09:28 PM   #9
Elbert is offline Elbert  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Ooooh, there we go...

Ok, a bit speculative.. but at the end of the day I believe there is a difference between a production facility manned by cheap labor force (no derogatory intention!) and a "traditional" business with a long standing tradition for taking care of the whole value chain from initial design to manufacturing and quality-control.

You can come a long way with staff training and procedures, but at the end of the day, it takes skill and knowledge to get that last percent right.. I know that from my own business!

The driver might still measure perfect with the phase-plug slightly off-center, but the end product doesn't convey that impresion of thoroughness and quality which contributes to that intangible feelgood factor..
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2009, 09:57 PM   #10
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Quote:
Originally posted by bzfcocon
On Zaph's site, there have been some reported issues with the Peerless exclusive line of midwoofers - off-center phase plugs and some consistency issue across different batches.

Not enough to affect functionality, but definitely not a good thing.
I own a pair of Peerless exclusives, soon to own two pairs. I have not had any problem with "off-center phase plugs", as well the voice coil is very close to the phase plug that it could not be offset by much without rubbing against the voice coil. I think if someone were to complain about an offset phase plug they may be splitting hairs...

As for the consistency, yes there have been some issues. When Peerless changed from DST to Tymphany, some changes were made to the drivers, but no model numbers were adjusted, and in some cases the datasheets were not updated either. There is some talk of this in the thread for my speaker build here, as well as some photos of the different cones.

The cone material was changed slightly, which changes a lot of the parameters of the driver and should require at the very least a datasheet update, if not a new model number all together. I did see that the datasheet for the 830883 was updated, but not the 830884. If you look at the old datasheet for the 830883 at Madisound, then look at the datasheet from Tymphany you can see the old and new drivers are a fair bit different.

The drivers themselves are great, but unfortunately due to the above it can be difficult to determine just what you have without measuring it yourself.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why not a ribbon tweeter instead of a horn tweeter? Curly Woods Full Range 9 15th July 2009 04:09 PM
Tweeter help for Miller & Kreisell Tweeter 17500 merajsalek Multi-Way 4 3rd September 2008 03:41 AM
Linaeum Dipole Tweeter as a Super tweeter? ktuuri Planars & Exotics 5 17th June 2008 06:52 PM
Titanium tweeter vs Ribbon tweeter goldyrathore Multi-Way 14 17th May 2004 07:21 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.13723 seconds (74.99% PHP - 25.01% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio