|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Israel
|
The only difference i see between these two drivers are as follows:
Code:
18W 18S BL 6.8 6.4 Qes 0.39 0.44 Qts 0.36 0.4 Looks like the only difference is in the magnet system. I wonder what would happen if i'll remove the shielding magnet off the 18S driver? Would it become 18W? I already have a pair of non-shilded 18W, and want to use two midbasses per speaker so i'd like to modify the 18S to make it become 18W. Thanks!
__________________
The missing link between lead and gold in alchemist's world was BS and commerce. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
|
If nobody else wants to answer this ; I'll give you my opinion.
if this is for a sealed box 2.5 way and one of these drivers is going to use a first order cut down as low as practicable, the do your box calculations and use the appropriate box size for each driver, and I would use the woofer with the higher "Q" as the low boost woofer. I have no idea if you want to use a ported box
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
The individual values are not as important as the ratios Fs/Qts and Vas x Fs² and if they are close then it's fine. You usually find more variation (10% or so) in manufacturing tolerances of driver to driver.
Model both in the same size box and tuning and you will find they wouldn't vary more than about 0.5dB-1dB. Don't go by the optimum calculated size for both as that could vary significantly. You are interested in their performance in the same conditions.... volume and tuning. If they are for a 2.5 way, then use the 18S as the 0.5 woofer. For an MTM you are better off with the same drivers but I doubt you would hear a difference unless you had golden ears. Don't try and remove the shielding and no it wouldn't make it a 18W.
__________________
No longer DIY active |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
How would one remove the shielding off of a 15S?
I read recently how some one removed the shielding off of a 18S, but I can't find the thread now. I have 26 spare neodymium magnets I want to symmetrically place on the back of each driver, around the vent that comes out the back. Is this a bad idea, lol I have a 15S/8530K01, I want to use as a midrange, so I want to make the BL a little higher so it might approach the BL/performance 15W/8530K00 model. I been thinking and I have come to the conclusion that this is a really bad idea due to the nature of magnetic fields. Can't believe I overlooked it earlier.
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team Last edited by Jimmy154; 26th November 2009 at 01:19 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 4x ScanSpeak 18W/8531-G00 | major | Swap Meet | 3 | 16th March 2009 09:23 PM |
| FS: Scanspeak Revelators 18S/8531 | durwood | Swap Meet | 1 | 22nd October 2008 01:54 AM |
| The Spassvogel MT's (Scanspeak 6600 & 18W/8531) | JonW | Multi-Way | 5 | 14th October 2008 01:57 PM |
| FS: ScanSpeak Revs 18W/8531 mint $325 | kappa546 | Swap Meet | 2 | 31st October 2007 09:20 PM |
| Scanspeak 8531 and 9700 2 Way Floorstander | ianpengelly | Multi-Way | 2 | 29th October 2006 05:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10180 seconds (64.09% PHP - 35.91% MySQL) with 10 queries |