|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
Tannoy ST50/100/200
Townshed Maximum Murata ES103A Are the newer generation of what I refer to as super-supertweeters with output to 100khz and they all cost around $1000+ The argument often being that parts of out ear can still detect frequencies over 20khz even if we don't notice it most of the time and that higher frequencies somehow interact with the lower frequencies etc. and other pseudo scientific explanations Interesting all the "official" reviews I've read are all positive but the personal reviews on the forums I've seen are far less stellar. Regardless these products probably have the worst price/performance ratio I've seen short of the Shun Mook Spatial Control Kits . In fact I'd sooner buy Bybee Quantum Purifiers than spend $1000+ for a supertweeter. I can see a more conventional supertweeter coming in around 10-15khz where a fullrange or conventional dome tweeter is falling off, particularly off axis, but I have my doubts about frequencies much higher up. Any experiences? Also noticed this using the Scanspeak R2904/7000: http://binaryacoustictech.com/batpag...pertweeter.htm |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
No first hand experience but these devices obviously do something audible. I just shudder to think what that may be with 44.1Khz digital and a fashionable NOS dac.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
I've heard Fostex Supertweters and what they do is very subtle.
Perhaps other questions would be: Are there any mics used in recording music that extend this high? Does any recording equipment (or media) extend this high? Are there any recordings that extend this high? It would seem to me to be pointless to spend thousands to listen to only a very small percentage of recordings.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
I heard the Tannoys some years ago and got to compare them with the affordable Fostex FT17H. To describe the difference between the units, as well as the presence of either as subtle would be an understatement.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
And if you wanted to get really fancy, the Fostex FT96H with Alnico. Still "only" about $120. Get 5 pair and you're still in budget. =)
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
What you are hearing with Supertweeters is usually in the 2000 to 20000 Hz area. Most supertweeters are crossed around 20000 Hz with a 1. order filter (6dB/Okt). That means they are down 6 dB at 10000 Hz, 12 dB down at 5000 Hz, 18dB down at 2500 Hz and 24 dB down at 1250 Hz. Even nearly deaf people can hear this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
http://www.madisound.com/catalog/pro...roducts_id=295 My response - meh. If your speakers need these, get better speakers. If you thought it was more than subtle, perhaps they weren't attenuated enough
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
I would not operate a driver intended to be crossed very high with a shallow slope. Such an approach is easy and lazy, but the driver will still be trying to reproduce signal much below it's intended bandwidth with all the distortion that will bring (which will likely be audible to some extent). |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
|
Quote:
In order for a supertweeter to succeed, it must be very small and placed as close to the real tweeter as possible. IMO adding a supertweeter to a system is putting a band aid on a fundamental design issue.
__________________
The power of Science compels you! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
What is a SUPER-tweeter anyhow? Cut in above 10Khz? Higher?
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| audio nirvana super 10 or super 12 | tonytex | Full Range | 11 | 4th September 2011 10:55 PM |
| Nirvana super 8 and cast super 8 how do they compare to 206E? | freddi | Full Range | 4 | 22nd October 2010 02:29 AM |
| WTB: Fostex T90A supertweeters | Studley | Swap Meet | 0 | 10th May 2009 01:05 PM |
| X-over freq for Pioneer supertweeters | flubug | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th November 2004 08:58 PM |
| Ultrasonic Raven Supertweeters? | Won | Multi-Way | 7 | 20th December 2001 11:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13009 seconds (75.45% PHP - 24.55% MySQL) with 10 queries |