|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nevada
|
My current passive xover uses decent quality caps, resistors, and coils. I made sure that I used very low DSR coils but did not go for the high end resistors and caps.
In my experience, the high end caps/resistors thang is questionable at best. Has anyone done true blind testing of passive xover components? Opinions? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Get ready for a can of worms. You aren't likely to get a consensus.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
Anything that results in variation in frequency response is potentially audible, such as poor tolerance and inductor resistance.
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
|
Yeah no it doesn't really matter what we think. If you want to find out pick up a soldering iron and build a couple of simple networks and see what you think.
Just use a simple 2 way as you test case. As long as the cap values don't get large it won't cost all that much to try the boutique caps. Even with a 18db network you are only talking a max of 3 pairs of caps as long as there are no zobels. Rob |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Quote:
I just say, use common sense and don't spend outrageous amounts. Use decent reasonably priced components, nothing more, nothing less. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
|
I've auditioned quite a few on my project with Esotec mid and high with C-Quenze 18 low. The mid is not as critical as high, but still important. Humblehomemadehifi has some great info. If proper timber of orchestral instruments is important, then anything under $45, except ASC or Obbligatto is dreadful.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A whole lot depends on what you can hear, and the absolute quality of the drivers, the cabinet and the rest of the system including the room, and the source material...
For most folks the effects of xover components are less substantial than other factors in the signal chain. For me personally, I have found that depending on the application it ranges between inaudible and very critical. Ymmv. Trying and testing is one way to find out... _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive xover question | ttako | Multi-Way | 1 | 23rd February 2009 08:46 PM |
| Sharing a passive Xover | Adrianb | Multi-Way | 17 | 26th May 2007 03:40 AM |
| OB passive xover w. augmenter - or BLH? | freddi | Full Range | 0 | 16th April 2007 04:03 PM |
| Passive Xover for Jim Griffin's new LA | Ray Collins | Multi-Way | 10 | 2nd December 2006 10:14 PM |
| Passive Bi-Amp Xover Project | roddyama | Multi-Way | 14 | 5th October 2005 08:58 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09076 seconds (78.56% PHP - 21.44% MySQL) with 10 queries |