|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
I am bulding a speaker.
I will have my CAD designer and his CNC man carve a dragon 'head' into the front, and the 'body' into the side. My crossover parts are heavy, as well as large. I will have a tail made. This tail will house the crossover. My first thought was fiberglass. On second thought this may not be strong enough. The tail will be lifted if the speaker needs to be moved or transported. I then thought of steel. My problem with steel is the possible effect it will have on the signal. The wires will run under this tail, with the parts on top. Possible future magnetization of the steel is also not good. (A fiberglass cover will be made to hide the parts). I then thought of stainless steel. What are your thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
keep the xover AWAY from any and all metal of any description.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
expert in tautology
diyAudio Member
|
metal is usually not best.
copper and brass are possible... but expensive. the issue is the effect upon the coils more than anything else. _-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com [...2SJ74 Toshiba bogus asian parts - beware! ] -- Btw, I don't actually know anything, FYI --
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: lisbon
|
Stainless steel is more ressonant than coper or aluminium.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
If I assume copper is a material which can be picked up by a magnet, but aluminum cannot, then aluminum would be better?.
Any other suggestions. The Mundorf transformers are very heavy, with the Duelund VSF's slightly less so. All in total, each crossover will be about 60 pounds per side. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
Quote:
EDIT: More generally, avoid any electrically conductive material.
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
I am not looking forward to the price of Kevlar, but that may be my only true option.
I think I should also investigate fiberglass. Does anyone have any knowledge as to whether 1/2" thick fiberglass can withstand hundreds of pounds. The bottom of the speakers will also sit on it with spiked feet under that?. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
And you mention transformers, Are these electrostatic ? Or do you mean inductors ???? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
A properly built box from 1/2" plywood will withstand hundreds of pounds... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
Troels Gravesen has proved very clearly that even aluminium affects inductor value He also shows how to get around it I have heard of people having their their 2ways on metal standmounts, complaining about severe problems with sound And when placing their speakers on a wooden chair they sounded just fine |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover construction techniques | wiredmonkey | Multi-Way | 13 | 25th April 2009 03:27 AM |
| Stainless Steel Death of Zen pre amp | DocLorren | Solid State | 10 | 29th October 2006 07:31 PM |
| Crossover construction | walriley | Multi-Way | 3 | 14th August 2006 03:25 PM |
| Crossover construction | da_madaxeman | Multi-Way | 0 | 19th October 2003 02:16 PM |
| Loudspeaker project from scratch - driver construction, cabinet, & crossover | UncleJessie | Multi-Way | 19 | 20th April 2003 04:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |