|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Hello,
In a multi-way speaker enclosure with isobaric compound-pair bass drivers, is there a relationship between the distance between the two drivers in the sealed chamber and the crossover frequency to the mid/tweeter? Something in the like of the crossover should be at a lower frequency than the half-wavelenght frequency determined by the distance between the two bass drivers sounds intuitive to me. Any opinions on that? Thanks! IG |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 12km off the alaska highway in northern BC
|
The crossover point has afaik no relationship to placement.
The important parameter is the phase/time delay between mid/tweeter and bass. Active x-overs with the ability to alter those work very well. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
The crossover frequency being within a half-wavelength of the physical distance between bass and treble is just a general recommendation and is nothing to do with if you are using isobaric drivers or not.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Theoretically there will be phase issues with 2 isobaric woofers
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind you
|
As the frequency of the sound approaches the distance between the two isobarik drivers, they will no longer be in phase, and will stop working as a pair. So yes, you will want to cross over before that happens. You want to keep the distance between the two drivers as small as possible anyway, to minimize the additional moving mass.
__________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/ |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Thanks for the input everyone! Mr Evil, you understood my question best and confirmed what I thought, thanks! IG |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Xono Mc loading question | inertial | Pass Labs | 5 | 13th November 2008 11:42 AM |
| isobaric loading for small box vs displacement | danielm | Subwoofers | 5 | 27th May 2008 03:20 AM |
| Isobaric loading, would this setup work??? | swin1 | Multi-Way | 3 | 20th May 2006 03:58 PM |
| MM Cartridge loading question | gurevise | Analogue Source | 7 | 16th December 2003 12:30 PM |
| Tannoy Horn loading question | pinkmouse | Multi-Way | 11 | 31st October 2003 07:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07715 seconds (76.59% PHP - 23.41% MySQL) with 10 queries |