Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd January 2010, 04:37 PM   #101
SimontY is offline SimontY  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
SimontY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield, North England
Send a message via MSN to SimontY
Phase plugs for tweeters probably have to be very carefully designed, so I'm not too surprised it didn't work. It's good to try all these ideas though, great work!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2010, 01:01 AM   #102
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: london
This timbrel and tonal warmth thing has been bugging me a lot. Peakiness in the treble and a thinness to the mids especially with voices was still not perfect. Things are now gonna get a little crazy.

I have made a BREAKTHROUGH

Initial impressions are very favourable.

WOOL WOOL WOOL.

I stuffed intially the inner perimeter of the cones using the phase plug as support and found this helped flesh out the tones. Too little and it remained lean and shouty, too much and the air and details would go. Get just the right amount and you can start to feel the emotion in the voices with the increased tonal variation and timbres. I then stuffed some inside each gap in the chassis of each speaker. Too much and you got wonderful focus but leanness,(presume this is due to the pressure effect against cone movement), too little and the benefit is minimal, however just a gentle stuffing covering the entire cone but with minimal pressure on the cone movement and i was geting close to what I have been looking for.

See photo. messy business, but works, now i am getting closer to the timbrel qualities I missed from my electrostatics and boxed speakers. With NO obvious effect on transparency, dynamics or details !!!!!!!See the photos.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (202.2 KB, 315 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (505.8 KB, 306 views)

Last edited by audiojoy; 6th February 2010 at 01:07 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2010, 01:51 AM   #103
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
I think this may be why someone invented grill cloth!

This reminds me of some experiments I did years ago with damping dome tweeters by the simple expedient of touching the dome lightly with my finger tip. I did this out of curiosity after trying to imagine what happened to the energy put into the dome around its periphery by the voice coil. Obviously it traveled across the surface toward the middle, but what then? I imagined a chaotic meeting in the middle and that it might benefit from being damped.

Well it seemed to! The result was not subtle and sounded like a distinct benefit to me, but I didn't have any means to measure the result.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2010, 01:54 AM   #104
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: london
still not right....... listening to two stringed instruments at the same time still highlighted to me that their timbral differences were not sufficiently clear to demonstrate that there were two clearly different instruments contributing to the overall sound and tune. Although seperation was the best i have ever heard on this savanna cd.

???time for the tone tubby's

This is now getting irritating, as alive as it sounds, I cannot fully appreciate the emotion and interplay between the instrumentalists without the right tonal variations. Where next??
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2010, 06:16 AM   #105
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Have you tried using 8 screws instead of 4 to hold the driver against the baffle?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2010, 09:34 AM   #106
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: london
I can add the max. no. of screws possible for securing the speakers to the plywood, but feel certain this will not resolve the situation. It is a more profound effect i am after. One that I believe physically mimics the instruments themselves in getting their harmonic structures right. Like Nelson hinted the sound of an instrument e.g like a guitar is related to the enclosure being present which will resonate. I willl either try the tone tubby's as they are supposed to be the 'kings of tone', or put semi rear enclosed boxes around the midrange drivers, but my woodwork skills are crap.

Or I will totally abandon the idea and go for the Anthony Gallo Reference speakers that achieve the same phenomena but utilise some form of spherical metal enclosure that allows some form of interaction between the drivers and a 'box'.

With all due respect to all you diy guys out there but due to the lack of description of the music that is heard from your diy jobs, I never really get to understand what it is that you are hearing subjectively. So i am never sure from hardly any of the projects exactly what you understand from the term 'real sounding'. Yes lots of lovely graphs ad measurements, but in most audiophile magazines measurements and the subjective sound quality do not always go hand in hand. Even more concerning is whether there is a consideration for and understanding of the subtleties of harmonics timbre and tone. Speak to an audiophile and they will go on and on about these ideas and observations as these are some of the prime elements that contribute to the emotion in the music. Yes yes yes listening to music is an incredibly subjective thing and we can claim that we all have our own preferences to what brings enjoyment to our ears and inherently there will be no worldwide standardisation and therefore we can argue about this till we are blue in the face.

However , in my search for musical nirvana, how come the electrostaics can do these tonality thingys so well??? Large surface area mimics surface area of a large enclosure??????

Last edited by audiojoy; 6th February 2010 at 09:50 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2010, 08:15 PM   #107
mige0 is offline mige0  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
mige0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austria, at a beautiful place right in the heart of the Alps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiojoy View Post
I can add the max. no. of screws possible for securing the speakers to the plywood, but feel certain this will not resolve the situation. It is a more profound effect i am after. ...

Not thinking I'm as picky at tonal perfectness then you, I'd nevertheless suggest to try some miracle medicine and "swing the speaker".

Just cut the baffle slightly bigger than the outer diameter of the basket and hang the the speaker at a rope or stranded steel wires or a chain - whatever you feel like - so that it can move freely in the OB hole.

Sounds strange at a first glance, but I'm pretty sure you will get the last (lost) quantum of resolution you are looking for.


Michael

Last edited by mige0; 7th February 2010 at 08:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2010, 08:26 PM   #108
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: london
Interesting,I think, but I will play it safe. I will go for those guitar speakers which prize themselves for use in open back baffles, huge Qmax, and tons of tone.Not sure which one would be best for general audiophile use. I know eminence make ceramic magnet hemp cone speakers , I think these will be the ones for value versus quality. Tone Tubby's might not necessarily be worth the price.

Will order four of these then report back.

Also not certain active subwoofers is the way to go either. Powerful single amp for all the drivers and a passive crossover might add to the cohesiveness and filling of upper bass loss that tends to occur in my baffle projects, without truncating the signal any further.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2010, 08:29 PM   #109
mige0 is offline mige0  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
mige0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austria, at a beautiful place right in the heart of the Alps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiojoy View Post
This timbrel and tonal warmth thing has been bugging me a lot. Peakiness in the treble and a thinness to the mids especially with voices was still not perfect. Things are now gonna get a little crazy.

I have made a BREAKTHROUGH

Initial impressions are very favourable.

WOOL WOOL WOOL.

I stuffed intially the inner perimeter of the cones using the phase plug as support and found this helped flesh out the tones.

If you are after a little bit of "boxiness" with OB - have you tried to add some wings ?

Michael
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2010, 08:31 PM   #110
mige0 is offline mige0  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
mige0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austria, at a beautiful place right in the heart of the Alps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiojoy View Post
Interesting,I think, but I will play it safe....

LOL - did you have a look at the pictures of your "treated" speaker ?


Michael

Last edited by mige0; 7th February 2010 at 08:33 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Open Baffle with Guitar Speaker davidallancole Full Range 5 28th March 2007 07:47 PM
Open Baffle vs Box Speaker Question Robert McLean Full Range 23 24th May 2005 09:54 PM
Open Baffle Speaker Design using BG Neo-8? Matt MacBeth Multi-Way 2 24th December 2002 03:44 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Page generated in 0.11552 seconds (80.71% PHP - 19.29% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio