|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#231 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
Another example of a stringed WOB (WithOut Baffle
)Xovers are at 100Hz and 1500Hz with 24dB/oct. Bass EQ is 20 dB total from 100-15 Hz. Mid EQ is 15 dB total from 450-100 Hz. The builder reported that there is almost no movement of the Kilomax when hung from the ceiling.
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Wow! that's a quick action, and wonderful, too!
![]() In such 'suspension', I found the compliance in the tensional direction is not necessary. By the relatively low mass and low rigidity, the vibration energy can not pass through the suspension effectively. So any string/wire/cable can be used if only the tensional strength is enough. (I myself use stranded steel wire with clips for hanging my mid-high horns) |
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I recommend to pay attention to some details - there is some reward of. Make sure you have well defined points where the most part of movement (bending) occurs - meaning - avoid any rubbing there (the internal friction is already something we can not avoid). Michael
__________________
Audio and Loudspeaker Design Guidelines |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I am very tempted to try the same with the woofer as well. I am a bit unsure whether such a heavy woofer (370 grams cone) with large Xmax will stay in place without any support. Just have to test it I guess. Will need a much heavier frame than I have now, but we'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
I got a center OB sub which the construction is very shallow, accommondating 2 18" with 130g Mms (total 260g). When playing, its vibration is quite obvious by touch.
OTOH, my main baffle is more rigidly braced and with deeper base board. And with only one woofer (same as above), it's much calmer by comparison. I think, baffle-less or not, these heavy woofers would better be braced/supported rigidly to obtain better dynamic and output. Suspended freely, there'd be inevitably opposite motion (or some forms of delayed and irregular motions... ) on the whole driver related to the cone. |
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
CLS,
Like I suspected... thanks. Think I'll go for a heavy bracket or something for the woofer. |
|
|
|
|
#238 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Regarding irregular motion - that's what I too thought before I dived into the topic – but actually quite the contrary is true. Try and you well see - aahhh - you will hear ![]() If you read through my paper (math is pretty simple) you can see that "movement in disorder" only happens with the common approach eg. trying to keep speakers rigidly in place – whereas suspending a speaker freely results in absolute predictable movement of veeeeery low amount. http://members.aon.at/kinotechnik/di...ducing_CIC.htm The net benefit is that there is *no* resonance whatsoever (except the veeeery low fundamental of the pendulum) when speakers are hung – well - for the overall movement we are talking of here. Seen from a more philosophically point of view my arguments outlined in the paper directly relate on the concept of "local mass" – which can be seen as an equivalent to "acoustically small dimensions". Michael
__________________
Audio and Loudspeaker Design Guidelines Last edited by mige0; 21st October 2009 at 11:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#239 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
Regardless it helps to make the pendulum as long as possible.
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Hmmm.... can't imagine now, but I'll try to understand. Thanks a lot
![]() For those drivers already installed on the baffle, what can be done? It seems all gaskets/spacers are not compliant enough. And it's hard to 'float' the whole assmebled baffle
Last edited by CLS; 21st October 2009 at 11:58 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| open baffle bass-dipole-what amp | felixx | Multi-Way | 20 | 13th December 2006 07:53 AM |
| Open baffle/ dipole design help | Infinity buff | Multi-Way | 3 | 12th April 2006 03:19 AM |
| New Open Baffle Dipole Pics | PaulHilgeman | Multi-Way | 25 | 27th April 2004 04:43 PM |
| Beyma (or other modest priced) drivers for a open baffle project. | swak | Multi-Way | 2 | 22nd November 2003 08:59 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12805 seconds (78.32% PHP - 21.68% MySQL) with 11 queries |