
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
16th March 2009, 04:59 PM  #11 
frugalphile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

I've only recently started using the golden ratio heavily. Any irrational number will usually do.
One has to be careful not to use root(2) twice in the same box. The ratio of the dimensions in the box in post 2 (0.707:1:1.414) can also be expressed as 1:1.414:2. That is the kind of ratio you want to avoid. dave
__________________
community sites tlinespeakers.org, frugalhorn.com, frugalphile.com ........ commercial site planet10HiFi p10hifi forum here at diyA 
16th March 2009, 06:51 PM  #12  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007

Re: Why the golden ratio?
Quote:
Is that  g = [0.5 + SqRt(5)] / 2 or... g = 0.5 + [SqRt(5)/2] Just curious. As I said in my initial post, I got my formula out of a speaker design book, but again it said this was for aesthetic appearance. From an architectural perspective, this is a shape that is visually appealing. Now keep in mind, this ratio seems to be from the 'bookshelf' era. Modern tower speakers seem to have abandon these ratios all together, though perhaps not the concepts the rule is based on. Also, can we have a consensus that this  0.618 : 1 : 1.618 is indeed the correct and true Golden Ratio. Steve/bluewizard 

16th March 2009, 07:17 PM  #13 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada

Agreed. From a technical standpoint, any irrational fraction will do. i.e.
Golden Ration / Fibonacci ==> 1/phi ==> 1/1.618..... natural exponent ==> 1/e ==> 1/2.71828.... Pi ==> 1/pi ==> 1/3.14159.... Any of these will ensure that room / reflection nodes are not reinforcing, but the Golden ratio tends to be the most convenient to work from. 
17th March 2009, 12:35 AM  #14  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.

Quote:
Since I typically design high aspect ratio cabs, this issue only applies to its width/depth where the Golden mean is one of many acceptable ratios, so typically suggest it as it's apparently the most familiar. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. 

17th March 2009, 06:01 AM  #15 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009


17th March 2009, 11:49 AM  #16 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire

The golden ratio is ( 1 + sqrt(5) ) / 2
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio A more detailed explanation can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction with the specific property I mentioned at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...n_ratio_.CF.86 
18th March 2009, 12:51 AM  #17 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009

So what about speaker placement? I just eyed this setup to where the height of my head is and put it off center so it wasn't a third but where I guessed the golden section of the room was.
Today I was curious as to how close I was and wanted to check other dimensions that I didn't even think about or consider  height and width. The Golden section of the height of my room is 58.7" and I checked and my phase plug is a fraction of a centimeter away from 58". The Golden section of the width of the room is around 73. And damn if that isn't my favorite spot to listen to the speakers in  a little in front of the sweet spot. I in no way did this on purpose with the set up. if I was shooting for that spot I would have probably put the speakers too close to the wall. That was my only aim with where I set them was to get the bass boost out of the speakers and pull them off the wall. Now the one I did sort of guess at was the length. I was off about 8". The golden section is 102" and I am at 110". I was just curious. I think I like where I have my speakers set, but do you think you derive benefit in the same way from speaker placement within the room as you do from the dimensions of the box and placement of drivers? Oh and I think the dimensions of my room might be close to 45sine+1 or the golden ratio. 
18th March 2009, 01:23 AM  #18  
frugalphile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites tlinespeakers.org, frugalhorn.com, frugalphile.com ........ commercial site planet10HiFi p10hifi forum here at diyA 

18th March 2009, 07:24 AM  #19 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004

PHEE, PHI PHO, PHUM!
(someone HAD to say it ) 
18th March 2009, 09:36 AM  #20 
R.I.P.
Join Date: Oct 2005

Hello,
For what it's worth, you'll find in attached file a graph I draw many years ago. This graph resulted from a study I did of the Rayleigh formula for the resonance modes of rectangular boxes (including rooms). The colors and yellow numbers give the maximum value of the difference of frequency between 2 following resonances (we want to minimize that parameter). Points on the red line corresponds to optimal values. You should try to design your boxes and room with such length/heigh and width/heigh ratios corresponding to a point on the red line. Best regards from Paris, France JeanMichel Le Cléac'h 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
The Golden Ratio Stage  Stee  Solid State  7  22nd February 2009 08:46 PM 
Golden Ratio Height  edjosh23  Full Range  13  3rd February 2009 09:52 PM 
W41320SB Golden Ratio BR  sharpi31  Full Range  4  8th December 2005 09:50 PM 
Golden Box Ratio  Important or not?  Ornlu  Subwoofers  5  27th May 2005 06:52 AM 
Golden ratio  Example?  icebear  MultiWay  5  17th April 2004 08:40 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 