|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How good are they as tweeters, let say 1kHz - 20kHz?
Any experience ?
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
At 78dB sensitivity suited to mating with a very small "subwoofer". http://www.linkwitzlab.com/Pluto/intro.htm |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario
|
[Disclosure - I haven't used this driver!]
The sample response graph provided by PartsExpress (http://www.parts-express.com/pdf/297-432.pdf) looks pretty rough (the manufacturer's spl curves appear to be "optimistic"). At 78 (2.83v/1m)(dB) its sensitivity is very low. You'd likely end up spending more time and money trying to tame this curve than it would be worth. Why not go with the actual 2" driver used in the Pluto - the AURA NSW2-326-8A? Or try the larger HiVi B3N 3" driver? Both have got excellent reviews and are more sensitive. The B3N is about the same price but the Aura is about $8 more each. What application were you thinking of using this for? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Basically this is the situation: I am using Vifa TC20 for OB speakers and a no-name brand for the rear firing tweeters. Crossed at 1.5kHz and audibly strained as the Fs of these drivers are 1.5kHz. Now, this is temporary until I can get something more decent, but low-Fs tweeters are quite expensive and will easily se me back $250 for 4 of them (Vifa DX27, etc.)
I have the Pluto so NSW2 is on hand. I also like it's sound I think they are very detailed and smooth. But not convinced that would be great for OB as the rear chamber acts like pipe. Looking at B2S, it has similiar radiating area as NSW2 and a "normal" loudspeaker shape. As they are opened-back it would eliminate the need of rear-firing tweeterst too as a bonus. I guess I just have to try them for $30 a pair ... was hoping that someone has done the task
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Enschede, Overijssel
|
How about a Tangband W2-800SF? It has good sensitivity (87 dB) and response up to 20 kHz.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
*(have to admit i haven't listened to a stock one yet) dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Hi gainphile,
I've used the B3S in a similar speaker to Zaph's (same filtering, slightly smaller box) and you're right, it doesn't have the same detail up high as a proper tweeter. In my case, nice for the application, though, as a non-fatiguing (near field of course) bedside speaker. Detailed enough close up. Cheers Stuey |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks all for the ideas. It seems like 3" is the maximum size of "possible tweeters". I will try to use my NSW2 on OB and will report tonight...
If that didn't work then the only way is to invest on normal dome tweeters with low Fs.
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It turns out that the Aura NSW2 used in Plutos are good for OB.
![]() These are open-backed so ideal for dipole speakers. Front near-field measurement is similiar to the datasheet. But my worry on pipe resonance from the rear is real. This is what measures nearfield from the back (ignore the absolute SPL level, they are uncalibrated). ![]() Measured from the farfield (80-100cm) this resonance has the influence on the summed dipole signals. ![]() Equalization value for the notch filter is easily calculated. Fs=1.6kHz, Q=3, depth=-8.5dB. Using software parametric equalizer and pink noise this is the equalised response: ![]() Frequency response of NSW2 is limited to around 15kHz. I feel it lacks the extreme sparkles (tymphany, etc). But what is gained from these tweeters are extreme 'cleanliness' of midrange sound. Must be the pistonic property of titanium cone. I notice guitars and female voice are extremely good. Cymbals are ok but not great. I think it's a keeper but let's wait for a week or so. Tomorrow off to jaycar to build the analog notch
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Hardly in the same class I think, but my impressions of the B3S are similar.
It has an alum/magnesium cone which gives that cleanness in the mids, such as with cow bells, guitar, and fem. voice. Best part about this speaker, in fact. Surprisingly, they give me a lot of enjoyment listening to good FM radio. Stuey |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Vifa D25ASG and HiVi TN28 tweeters | creek | Swap Meet | 0 | 9th January 2008 03:09 AM |
| A line array using HiVi B3S or B3N & Apex Jr tweeters? | Brisso57 | Multi-Way | 6 | 10th August 2007 08:02 PM |
| HiVi M6N in OB | arc2v | Multi-Way | 11 | 2nd August 2007 09:25 AM |
| Hivi Q1R | Phlim | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st July 2006 08:49 PM |
| why not hivi d6.8? | jazzbearz | Multi-Way | 3 | 14th February 2005 11:42 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09848 seconds (88.27% PHP - 11.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |