Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th February 2009, 04:38 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Default Hemp Cones and SQ?

Any thoughts or adjectives to describe the performance of Hemp as a cone material? Muddling over a high sensitivity 2way for HT and thought this driver http://www.parts-express.com/pe/psho...16&ctab=9#Tabs might be a good choice crossed to a 1" compression driver at 1.5khz. Any thoughts ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 11:57 AM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Very likely you would be better off with this :
http://www.zaphaudio.com/Waveguidetmm.html

If you have speaker modelling skills you could try to use the Seas
reed cone drivers (above designed before they were released.)

/sreten.


http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html
http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spk...esigningXO.htm

http://www.zaphaudio.com/
http://www.rjbaudio.com/projects.html
http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spkrbldg/
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 02:11 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Funny you should mention the WgMM, i built a pair with the RLY version sealed in 30L and i'm very happy with them. We're in the proccess of setting up a dedicated HT and i was hoping to build something new for behind the At screen. Something a bit more Dynamic. I see alot of interest in Pro drivers these days and thought i might give one a try. May go the route of the Nathan, but where's the fun in that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 05:43 PM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: Hemp Cones and SQ?

Quote:
Originally posted by mayhem13
Any thoughts or adjectives to describe the performance of Hemp as a cone material? Muddling over a high sensitivity 2way for HT and thought this driver http://www.parts-express.com/pe/psho...16&ctab=9#Tabs might be a good choice crossed to a 1" compression driver at 1.5khz. Any thoughts ?
<rant>
As far as hemp goes for a speaker cone, one should give it no more status than any other paper cone material ... why?

1/ there are literally an almost unlimited number of receipes for paper that have sufficient material from a plant with the name hemp in it, for the marketing department to call it hemp.

2/ there are over a dozen different plants with common names having the term hemp in them. Only 1 of those is "true" hemp or fibre from cannabis plants. For instance the preferred receipe for "hemp" cones in the tone tubby patent application, uses manila hemp. Manilla is a close relative to the banana plant, and no relation to cannabis. It should be noted that when this question is raised wrt the hemptone drivers (including the Omegas) no one is willing (or doesn't know -- the response from Louis himeself) to give a straight answer.

These plants all got the "hemp" added to their names because, when the US Government made cannabis hemp illegal, they needed a way to indicate substitutes as hemp was widely used in a hige number of applications (to the point where the ban on c hemp was lifted for the WW II effort)

3/ even if the cone has true hemp in it, things like the paper receipe (including fiber length, and how they were processed), the cone profile & construction, any coatings, the glue bonds, and surrounds, and how synergistic the cone is with the rest of the speaker all play significant roles.

4/ That said, c hemp (as with any of the pretenders -- they did earn the suffix because of similar properties) have the potential to make VERY good paper. But a single ingredient in the paper, with no context, tells you very little about the loudspeaker
</rant>

A musical instrument loudspeaker, in general, has to be carefully considered for repurposing for hifi -- the design goals are not the same. At least it is not a guitar speaker.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 10:12 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: flyover country
Looks like a nice driver. The only significant possible negative I noticed was that it was not back vented. However, it may be vented through the voice coil, but even if not, that may not be that important for the application in this case.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 10:28 PM   #6
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by thoriated
The only significant possible negative I noticed was that it was not back vented.
I'd actually call that a positive... those vents can cause some nasty sonics.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2009, 11:59 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: flyover country
So, would you prefer venting through the voice coil to back venting from a SQ perspective? I'm thinking of a particular driver here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2009, 12:24 AM   #8
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by thoriated
So, would you prefer venting through the voice coil to back venting from a SQ perspective? I'm thinking of a particular driver here.
Out the sides around the spider, still behind the cone would be preferrable... the pole piece vent can cause quite an oil can resonance,

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2009, 12:27 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: flyover country
Thanks. Some of my favorite bass drivers, JBL K145's (alnico) with E145 recone kits are made that way (vented through the voice coil).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2009, 01:04 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Any thoughts on the frequency response? Looks nice til 1.5k. Bass response also flat to 50hz with a 45hz tune in 51L.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hemp FR8 vs Hemp FR8C - Which One? Estes Full Range 16 4th May 2009 07:42 AM
Plastic cones or paper cones? beppe61 Multi-Way 19 19th February 2006 11:37 AM
Oval cones AJinFLA Multi-Way 2 14th July 2005 04:11 AM
Speaker Cones the_wonderchild Multi-Way 40 16th May 2005 05:44 PM
Better Than Cones/Sex mrfeedback Multi-Way 28 13th May 2004 06:02 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.11815 seconds (82.37% PHP - 17.63% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio