Am I using Unibox correctly? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th February 2009, 11:26 PM   #1
zimjj is offline zimjj  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Default Am I using Unibox correctly?

Iím looking at mating my center channel design (51/4Ē Revelator / Hiquphon tweeter) with a woofer to make a pair of mains. I figured I could cross over around 200 Hz. I wanted to try the ScanSpeak 9Ē 23W / 4557T00. The Madisound website suggests pairing it with its passive radiator the ScanSpeak 23W / 0-00-00 in a 1 cf box.

I modeled it in unibox and got an F3 of 26.5hz with 140 watts / walls covered / no leaks. That looked pretty good but I got cone excursion problems at 35 Hz. I played with the mass of the pr and if I took it down to 200gm (half the spec ) it looked pretty good, but I have no idea how much weight you can remove, if any, from that pr.

I then tried reducing the volume and at 20L it looked pretty good (F3 of 28.3hz), but when I started sizing the box, getting two 9Ē speakers to fit seemed pretty sporty. I wanted them to both point forward, I definitely donít want one in the side wall. If I put the pr in the back Iím afraid the box might be too shallow.

I donít have permission from my Chancellor of the Exchequer to start a new project at all, let alone an expensive one! So right know I just want to learn the process.

So, any comments on those two designs?

Then I have some general unibox questions-

First and foremost Ė am I even running unibox correctly?
What does the impedance curve tell me about the design?
What do the Step Response and Power Amplifier peak voltage tell me?

Lastly - looking at the spl curve where all contributors are plotted I was surprised to see the excursion drop off rapidly at the low frequencies and more surprised that the contribution of the pr added to make the total spl respectable. I wouldn't have thought the pr would add, since I assumed it was out of phase.


Iíve pasted the T/S parameters into an attached text doc.

I will certainly appreciate any advice,

JohnZ
Attached Files
File Type: txt unibox_inputs.txt (504 Bytes, 10 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need some Help with Unibox LetGoMyEggo Everything Else 3 3rd March 2009 03:10 PM
Help with Unibox todd95008 Multi-Way 4 15th June 2008 02:38 PM
Unibox rinx Multi-Way 8 5th November 2007 04:38 AM
unibox pkgum Multi-Way 11 2nd July 2006 06:36 PM
Am I using UniBox correctly? needtubes Subwoofers 3 12th June 2005 02:02 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:51 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2