|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
I'm close to pulling the trigger to order the parts for Zaph's all metal system but have a few questions first...
1.) I see these are very nearly the same as his SR71's, Which version is better and what are the differences? 2.) Instead of placing these speakers on stands I was going to make 10" speaker boxes to set them on, to give the system more oomph down low. The plan is to make the monitor boxes sealed (~8L) and put the H1209's in a sealed box as well (~40L). They match the rest of the system cosmetically (assuming I make the "all metal system"). In doing research I see a few people really like these in sealed boxes. 3.) the monitors will be bi-amped with the subs so the crossovers will be electronic (~100Hz). I'd appreciate any input on this before I order all the parts. So... - does this sound like a reasonable plan? - any changes you would make? - am I being an idiot? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Belleview, FL
|
Hi Ryan,
I have built a set of L18's and they are very good speakers. I'm not sure why you would want to modify the design. Essentially you would be building a new set of speakers and would need to adjust everything. I have not built the other set of speakers you mentioned so I can't offer a comparison. I'll just repeat that the L18's are very good and I am quite pleased with them. A picture is here: Good luck and I hope it works out for you! Regards,
__________________
------------ Ed Long |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Ed,
Thanks for the reply. I kind of thought better about this, like you say it's essentially a 'new' speaker and I'd have to adjust everything and right now that is over my head. I wanted to add the 10" to that set because I didn't think a single 6.5" driver would satisfy me for cranking some hard rock once in a while. I decided to go with his waveguide TMM's, which I have been eyeing for quite some time. They sound closer to what I'm looking for and I don't need to reinvent anything. I think I'm better off making a design exactly form plans the first time through so I can hopefully learn from that and make more educated decisions for myself in the future. BTW. nice looking speakers... I gotta learn how to veneer! Ryan |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Deep Elem
|
I built the L18s and really enjoy them. They can get loud but you need a husky amplifier to drive them to really high levels. Driven properly, they have plenty of output for my room.
pete |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I , too am building the all metal 2 way. I'm about 95% done, The box is finished ,the xo are assembled and mounted to the box, the tweeter is mounted as well as the terminals, But I only lack the woofers, Which are also ready to mount as soon as they arrive.
It is generally accepted , But not always true , that metal cone, being much stiffer than paper and plastic , have better bass and midbass reproduction and can handle more power. This is why I choose to build this instead of the sr71, Out of curiousity. Well, I sure would find out soon.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
I have built both the SR71 and the L18 design. They are both very good speakers, but slightly different. The L18 I think is a little more detailed, and is a little better with rock. The SR71 does better with bottom end (I think) and is a little smoother and less forward. Better for background music than the L18 design. Below are pics of both:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
I'm surprised that you say the SR71 has better bottom end. The L18 is very solid down low and I certainly don't find them to be forward. This is a very good design for sure.
__________________
Website |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Wow , Those are very nice looking speakers, Truely high end lookind, I wish I had a wood finishing skills like yours.
I made my Own box on my L18/tbfcg too, THough my wood working skill is good, The finish is paint and dont look even remotely good as yours, The color of the box on my L18/Tbfcg is deliberately irritating orange. Will post pics on these board as soon as it is done. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
For what it's worth, I never did say which I liked better. I like the L18 design better. So, although my use of the word forward was taken as negative, it isn't. I prefer that over the SR71.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zaph going to crucify me? ZD5 Questions :) | garage1217 | Multi-Way | 24 | 14th February 2008 07:16 PM |
| My Zaph Hi-Vi B3S Single Driver System Project | zei | Multi-Way | 12 | 16th April 2006 10:04 AM |
| RS180 Modula MT vs Zaph Seas Metal 2 way | AutoAudio | Multi-Way | 5 | 22nd March 2006 01:42 AM |
| The Filter design for Zaph,s Hi-Vi B3S single driver system | zei | Multi-Way | 5 | 25th October 2005 09:00 PM |
| Tony Gee or Zaph's all metal Sea's design? | ShinOBIWAN | Multi-Way | 7 | 10th August 2005 05:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12203 seconds (78.66% PHP - 21.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |