|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
well.. essentially I'm trying for a multidriver.. smaller than standard bookshelf speakers with decent everything. sounds impossible.. i know..
my current plan.. exterior - single box style, interior is going to be 2 different spaces, so hidden baffle. bass - 1 or 2 (isobaric) 3 inch subs from tangband top section - full range drivers from tang band (3") its just a thought for now. isn't heavier better? =P but I want to keep it small, and the sub will be downward firing, speakers will be on 1 inch standoffs. oh. btw. anyone know where else to get tb speakers in canada? solen doesn't have any bamboo series. |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
Jeff Bagby's Box Modeller 3.20 shows differently. In some (maybe many) cases, the f3 will appear similar in numbers, but the Qts is different for either wiring, even if you're using the same volume. The curve also appears different, the rolloff often having a hump or sometimes a more "rounded" bottom. The volume requirement for similar output isn't exactly 50%, more like 60-70. I can't recall exactly why this is, maybe someone a little more well-read will jump in. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
One single (mono) box containing all the drivers or two (stereo) boxes each housing a woofer and a fullranger? I am continually impressed by the amount of bass that can be extracted from any number of 4" drivers, but that 3" woofer might not get you any satisfying output in any other situation than desktop comuter speakers. A quality 4" do the job that you're trying to accomplish. At any rate, I can't think of any situation where the tiny volume requirements for a 3" driver would need to be reduced even further, unless it's going into a matchbox car
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
ok ok i can do a footprint of 4" =P
lets see if i can explain it better.. this is going to be a stereo setup, 2 boxes in total. each "box" will house 2 drivers, 1 full range and 1 subwoofer. each will be separated by an invisible sealed baffle? i think that is what you call it.. i don't mind porting the sub, but i think i calculated something stupid like 0.5 inches in diameter and 2 inches length.. where am i going to find pipe like that.... if you say the 4" are good, can you recommend one? i'm trying to source them in canada, and hopefully around 25-30 each. the enclosures will be mdf. thanks for your help! |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Quote:
O.K., now I get it, we're simply using just a little bit of different language. A baffle is the name given to whatever seperates the front wave from the backwave (usually the front of the cabinet), what you're referring to can simply be called a separator or divider. A 4"x4" footprint isn't very big. If the enclosure could be 36" or more tall, then there would be something to work with. At 12" tall, you're going to net less than 1.5 liters. I can't think of any 4" driver that could live in that volume with any output below 100Hz. I also can't imagine that a 3" driver would do any better, even if the Fs is 65Hz. By no means do I want to discourage anyone, but if it's bass you're after in this small of a package, I cannot see a way to do it, even with an isobaric setup. If you can do a seperate sub in a more remote location, then I have a list of the usual 4" suspects, but a 3" fullranger will probrably do a fine job at less cost. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
reminds me of this commercial design:
http://www.barefootsound.com/products_mm27.html looks like a kind of push pull thing: http://www.barefootsound.com/technology.html J. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
yeah! something like that.. actually you're right too.. the footprint is really small. what if i do something like a 6 x 8 x 14 wxdxh... i dunno. i need to run it through the calculators again.. which calculator do u use?
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
that's not my design, sorry.
all I know about it is, that the tweeter is a scan speak (probably a 9500 or 9700), the mids are from vifa (p13 I think), and the subs look like some peerless (x)xls 10 aluminium. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| push pull power amp design question (a lot of actually :) ) | krusty75 | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 25th September 2008 05:07 PM |
| New design: 12V push-pull tube amplifier | engels | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 20th September 2007 03:02 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| 833 push pull design help | sickss | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 7th March 2005 03:25 PM |
| DHT triode push pull amplifier design | James D. | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 5th December 2002 08:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |