|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Hi All
First time post here. I'm a frequenter of Canuck audio mart and AVS forum. Great site so far for DIY, tons of info. I'm looking at building some 3-way LCR speakers and considering using the solen active loudspeaker module for the tweet and mid http://www.solen.ca/pub/cms_nf_catal...2=2&niveau3=40 Powering the Vifa 27TG35 tweeter and the Vifa DM75MX-41 mid (both of these used in PMC OB1+ speakers which I love) and then using an Anthem MCA30 3-channel amp to power the woofers, likely a pair of 8" drivers, possibly the usher 8955A. I'll be crossing over to my infinate baffle subwoofer at 40Hz. and using active crossovers to split the lows from the mid/highs. anyone have any comments on this perspective design? I don't mind building cabinets to suit driver choices, and my woodworking skills are none too shabby... |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
There seems to be no highpass on DM75, or have I missed it |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
Gemini CX-1000 http://www.abesofmaine.com/item=GMCX1000~item.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Assuming that the amplification and crossover ideas aren't ludicrous, I wonder how I would be better served for the woofers enclosure. if an F3 @ 40Hz is acceptable, would I be better off with a ported or a sealed enclosure? I'm very open to larger sized enclosures...
What I'm looking for is good mid-bass impact and detail. subwoofers are covering 40Hz on down. I've also got to decide whether to build one large enclosure with the tweet and mid seperated, or build seperate enclosures for the mid/tweet and bass bins. (I'm leaning towards a single enclosure) |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
I would recommend closed fore woofers, and find the woofers that suit the situation If the Usher you mention is W8955K, it seems they roll off nicely around 45-50hz/-3db I would recommend seperate enclosures As you use standard active filters, it may be convenient to be able to adjust the position of each box section But whether its a good thing you are planning, is hard to say...how the suggested drivers behave with those active filters is probably as unpredictable as passive filters And to combine two completely different active filter designs may not go so easy either |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
soundemon
I also have one of these that I bought to hopefully dial in different drivers before designing the Xovers for speakers. I bought a Gemini CX-1 but didn't get any instructions do you think you could send me a copy of yours? I looked on line everywhere and can't find one. You're my only hope. Thanks Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
I'd say build this : http://www.zaphaudio.com/ZDT3.5.html Use your active crossover, 3 channel amplifier and subwoofer. It will work far, far better that what you are planning. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
If I had the manual I certainly would make you a copy. Sorry I can't help!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello,
Did you build the ZDT3.5's? If you did, I sure like to hear about it, also what you are referencing them to and driving them with. I built the BAM MTM and so far not to happy, but hoping to discover I made a mistake in the Xovers (still in that discovery stage 2/2009). What's your suggestion on using the active crossover? I have the Gemini CX-1 It sounds like my idea is a bad one...? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
No i have not built them. IMO a cheap chinese 15W/40W active module used for mid and treble is not going to hold a candle to a good 200W amplifier driving a properly designed loudspeaker. The ZDT3.5 seems the sort of thing that you want, by relaxing the subwoofer point upwards you could make them quite compact. I think you be better off using your 3x200W amplifier full range. Using any good loudspeaker design that you want. Using active c/o's is not a short cut to good speaker design, it is fine if the active c/o's are designed properly, but they are not "designed" at all if already built into modules. Also note the ZDT3.5 has a different centre channel version. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| for sale four ways active crossover | patriz | Swap Meet | 1 | 6th May 2008 12:42 PM |
| Active filter 2 ways, your opinions? | franck1234 | Parts | 16 | 2nd December 2007 05:30 PM |
| I need a two ways Bessel active crossover schematic | gaetan8888 | Multi-Way | 2 | 30th August 2007 12:21 PM |
| active 2 ways with SPH-165KEP and Fountek neocd 3.0 | Nemophyle | Multi-Way | 4 | 26th July 2005 09:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11774 seconds (83.85% PHP - 16.15% MySQL) with 11 queries |