|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
|
Hello,
In seeking of high efficiency midrange for home hifi, how about using some of the guitar elements as midrange somewhere between 200Hz-2kHz? When crossing low enough at 1-2kHz can avoid most of the cone breakup. For example some of the Celestion seems promising http://professional.celestion.com/gu...etail.asp?ID=4 Claimed efficiency 100dB seems tempting for a small tube amp ![]() Any experience you would like to share? - Elias
__________________
Home page If our hearing would be accurate, we would be hearing two loudspeakers. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
General Nuisance
diyAudio Member
|
There is a guitar speaker by eminence that makes a good mid range as reported by a few people here, I think it's called the "Lil Buddy"
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
I've heard some people dig the "Tone Tubby" driver in this way, but I have no personal experience with it.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
One should note the high Qts of these drivers. They are best suited for OB purposes.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Some professionals seem not like this idea because of such drivers tend to have too short of Xmax and cones with severe breakups, thus bad linearity and poor stop band behaviors (especially when play loud).
I think, choosing the right one and using it under limited bandwidth and SPL, the problems above maybe not so serious. (Be careful with those published frequency response charts. The real breakup peaks may probably be much worse than they look on paper. ) I am experimenting with such setup right now. The driver is Emimence Legend 125 (the wrong one), which I've already owned and used on and off for some years. This model comes with some broad and huge breakup peaks (10dB or the likes) centered around 2.5kHz. So, using it as is is almost unbearable. Some mods to the driver are needed. These are done to the drivers (for the time being): 1. cut the dust cap and insert a phase plug onto the pole peice. 2. apply PVA glue on both side of the cone. 3. cut the paper surround at some partilcular areas to soften the overall suspension. 4. apply silicon oil on the spider for furthur reducing the stiffness After these mods, the breakup peaks seem largely tamed. I examined this by impedance scan and simple RTA, and finally, ears. Now they are playing music (other than electric guitar, of course) and quite pleasing. The cone is folded straight profile with corrugated press. It's light and stiff inherently. Now it's furthur hardened by the PVA glue. Within the range I'm using (160~3kHz, OB'ed), it's dynamics and details are quite good. It lost some sensitivity on the lower mids because of those cuts on surround (sound waves on front and back of the cone are short circuited here). So I'll do something on it later. The whole thing is on going and not completed yet. I'll update here if you're interested. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
Elias, did you look at the 10" Celestions. I can't remember whether it was guitar series or PA series. The ferrite version was actually flatter on paper than the neo version. Around 97 Db.
I was interested in this one but could not find a price for it in Australia. I am now looking at a 10" PHL, around 100 Db, available here though a bit pricey. jamikl |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melb
|
Quote:
you can find various Celestion models here: http://www.svvintageamps.com/ I believe they send overseas as well. Cheaper than PHY. Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
PA drivers are far more sensible for midrange than guitar drivers. Distortion profiles are completely different, you want the former. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
|
Hello,
Quote:
http://professional.celestion.com/pr...etail.asp?ID=7 I've been looking at this too. There seems to be some link to Monacor, however specs are a bit different http://www.monacor.de/typo3/index.ph...4&spr=EN&typ=u - Elias
__________________
Home page If our hearing would be accurate, we would be hearing two loudspeakers. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
|
Hello,
Quote:
![]() Propably it's very true that distortion is very different. However, I've never seen any published distortion plots of any guitar drivers, so direct comparison to PA drivers is impossible at this point. - Elias
__________________
Home page If our hearing would be accurate, we would be hearing two loudspeakers. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High efficiency 12 inch midrange - recommendations? | hasselbaink | Multi-Way | 13 | 8th March 2013 11:23 PM |
| high efficiency midrange | tsmith1315 | Car Audio | 15 | 15th March 2009 11:02 PM |
| High efficiency 15" | TomatoBangBang | Multi-Way | 72 | 11th November 2008 06:55 PM |
| UK source of inexpensive 3" or 4" driver - high efficiency | sreten | Full Range | 9 | 23rd November 2005 03:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |