|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Current living arrangements mean that I need some really small speakers for near-field use (speakers and me will form a 5-foot equilateral triangle), and was hoping I could get some tips. I've got some ScanSpeak 15Ws coming in the mail, and would like to use them in small sealed boxes (about 1/4 cubic foot) crossed over at about 80hz to a TC Sounds Epic 12 (in another sealed box). I'm in the process of buying a DCX2496, and I've got 150WPC of Rotel power for the woofers, 60WPC of yet more Rotel power for the tweeters, and 800 watts for the sub.
So, here are the questions: 1. Tweeter. I've got some BG Neo3PDRWs; I've never used them before, but have heard them in some Martin Logans. While I thought that the speaker overall was horrible (something was wrong with the midbass drivers), I really liked the treble. That said, there are better tweeters out there. Would using the Neo3 be putting pearls before swine, or should I save up and buy something else? And, if so, should I go for some more Revelators, Hiquphons, or something else? 2. Box size. I was thinking of building them 11" tall, 12" wide, and about 12" deep. To smooth out the dispersion, I intend to use 3" roundovers on the sides of the speaker and a 3/4" roundover along the top and bottom. That said, I've heard a lot of discussion on the narrow baffle vs. wide baffle discussion - what would you recommend? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
IMO, you only need to baffle compensate the M driver if you offset the NEO3-PDR (XO>= 2 kHz) by placing as close as possible to one corner on the flattest parts of your baffle. Argument: See picture: 1(1) b 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
see : http://www.zaphaudio.com/nondomes/ and http://www.zaphaudio.com/ZD5.html and this stuff in general : http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spk...esigningXO.htm http://www.zaphaudio.com/ http://www.rjbaudio.com/projects.html http://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spkrbldg/ The combination could work well. Note for nearfield you need reduced baffle step. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Studio Monitors (nearfield) - around the NeoPro5i | AdamZuf | Multi-Way | 57 | 4th June 2007 10:02 PM |
| recording/mixing nearfield monitors | ogulinoglo | Multi-Way | 3 | 14th June 2004 10:03 PM |
| Taking a hack at nearfield monitors | Freakaccident | Multi-Way | 42 | 27th November 2002 06:44 AM |
| re: nearfield monitors | jeantofte | Multi-Way | 5 | 12th October 2002 10:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07896 seconds (75.92% PHP - 24.08% MySQL) with 11 queries |