|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Hey Brandon, my Son is heading off to 2nd semester and needs some speakers for his PC we built over the winter break. Mostly for movies and music with a little gaming. Was thinking of your Noobster MTM design with the new PE monitor amp
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/psho...number=300-774 Would be really convienient for PC use so he could free up some space without an amp/receiver. The efficiency seems like a good match as well. He'll be listening nearfield so it's a toss up between front or rear port in 1 cuft. The Amps just went on sale and considering the cost reduction of no passive components, seems like a no brainer. I'm concerned if i'll need to add a passive notch or if the 3k xo 24db/oct will get it done on it's own. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
A polite Bump.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
I'm not Brandon, but I think I can comment on this. If you use the active crossovers of the plate amp, the speakers will have nothing to do with Brandon's design except only the choice of drivers.
And you can't expect good driver summation from the use of active crossovers with predetermined slopes, due to the drivers' natural rolloffs. I have modeled quite a few crossovers for the W5-704D in MTM for people here and over at the PE Tech Talk board. I can quickly model a crossover with the PE plate amp if you ask me. You'll definitely need additional (not many, though) passive components to achieve good crossover performance. If you want high efficiency, a single TB W6-789S in MT is a good option, too. What tweeter do you want to use? The Vifa DX25? -jAy |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Thanx Jay and yes the DX25. I know he's going to drive them to their limits so hopefully the high efficiency will give him enough output without doing it too often. If the component count isn't too high, i'd certainly appreciate the effort. What first attracted me to Brandons design and the plate amps is the abilty of the 704 to play up to 3k nicely. I could just scratch the plate amps and give him my Onkyo M-282 but something tells me with a few components this is going to sound really really good.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
Did you already purchase the drivers?
Oh, one more thing. Where will the speakers be placed? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
I've got the 704s, but not the Vifas. They'll be nearfield about 40" apart and 30" from the listener. Basically on either side of a 32" monitor at a workstation. In an MTM design, the tweeters would be at ear level. A sub probobly wouldn't work in a dorm room so if i can avoid one and having to pay for an off campus apartment down the road......LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
Being crossed at 3 kHz with a higher order filter, the DX25 is an overkill. The Dayton ND20FB-4 or ND20FA-6 will be perfect in this application. Plus, they have no higher (even slightly lower) tall order distortion than the DX25 above 3 kHz. Also, if the speakers are near-field, they will be very sensitive to the slight change of the listener's ear level due to MTM lobing errors with the 3 kHz xover point. Close driver spacing with the Dayton neo will help here. If you still want the DX25, I can model up the xover with it, though.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
The Dayton ND20FB-4 looks like a real money saver here so thanx for the recommendation. If you wouldn't mind setting me up with a passive network that'll work with the plate amp, i'd greatly appreciate it. Thanx in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
I was also wondering if mounting this tweeter in a shallow waveguide as a continuation of the existing housing would help with the two peaks in the F5 at 2.1 and 2.7khz. I'm under the impression that the tweeter will operate a bit more efficiently but would need a cap to shape the freq response back to flat. Would the results be worth the effort with such an inexpensive build. I have a lathe and lathe operating experience if that helps. I've done a few cutting tests with MDF circles in the past and had good results. I'm suggesting something small, maybe 2.5" in diameter as not to increase the D to D spacing.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
Wave guide experiment will be interesting and may be worth the effort in some other design. But in our case, the crossover will be acoustic LR6 so distortion below 3 kHz will be a non issue. Also, the WG will change the response, and modeing it will be out of the question.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help fix my powered sub.. | alex paik | Subwoofers | 9 | 31st March 2006 12:40 AM |
| Powered sub peaks | MichaelJHuman | Multi-Way | 0 | 9th September 2005 11:39 PM |
| AV to non-powered sub | TamDax | Subwoofers | 1 | 13th March 2005 08:55 PM |
| DYI vs Powered PC Rig | thinker311 | Multi-Way | 0 | 18th February 2005 06:44 AM |
| DC-33 DC Battery Powered Amp?? | moe29 | Pass Labs | 2 | 26th April 2004 06:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10755 seconds (79.95% PHP - 20.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |