|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
I see that JBL says to use a one cu/ft sealed box, but when I use unibox it says .5 cu/ft. is correct. Will it work in a .5 box?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I've got a couple but haven't tried them in that size sealed cab.
It looks like in a .5 cu. ft. box it would be close to a Qtc of .707 Second Order Butterworth (B2) Max Flat Amplitude. This is a popular median alignment for sealed cabs and probably why Unibox picked it. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Destiny
|
Use what JBL reccomends.
Rob |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
remember to subtract for the volume of the speaker and anything else inside the box, and take into account box losses, Ql...
_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. -- |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
What is the volume a 2206 displaces?
RobH - I understand JBL know's best, but why would the recomend a box that has a Qtc of .57. There is some additional extension of 1.5 db at 60 Hz in the larger box? In my application I will not be going lower than 80 or 100 hz. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Yes a larger box would drop the F3. A sealed cab has a gradual -12db/octave roll off anyway.
Philosophically, I consider a woofer to be an engine that has a performance envelope. You can jam alignments, trading off goals, extension for size, and vs versa etc. I have heard the 2206 in a variety of cab designs and sizes, and implemented corrected sounded great. Volume displaced by driver: 0.2 cubic feet * I'm guessing this is an approx. Edit JBL's pdf on this says 4l (.15 cu. ft. ) |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
HK - Did you ever listen to a .6 ft box.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
No.
FYI: I just finished rebuilding 2 of these and a 2226H and ran impedance sweeps and T/S parms. I have considered making a "standard" 1 cu. ft. test box, for the 2206, but nothing that small, even though it fits T/S wise, JBL recommendations are from 1cu ft sealed - 4 cu. ft vented. The pro use apps I am most familiar with are in larger cabs. May I ask? What's the app.? Are you planning on hi-passing to these w an active xover, w subs for the bottom octaves? Syd |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
This is for a very simple home theater setup, not really to worried about super acurracy. Active crossover, with a single self powered Pioneer subwoofer for the bottom. The sub has a self contained electronic crossover variable from 50 to 120 Hz. I got some small cheap book shelves (don't ask) that can't get anywhere 120 with any authority. Looking for something to fill in some impact. I was thinking at 80/100 Hz to 250 Hz.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JBL 2206 crosswover | b3keys | Multi-Way | 1 | 29th April 2009 07:08 AM |
| Any Exp. w TH using JBL 2206 or 2226? | HK26147 | Subwoofers | 9 | 23rd August 2008 08:46 PM |
| Box size? | mikee55 | Subwoofers | 5 | 22nd April 2007 11:44 PM |
| what size would the box be if ........ | zuki | Subwoofers | 14 | 19th March 2007 04:39 AM |
| Speaker size v Room size | cliffy | Multi-Way | 6 | 19th February 2005 08:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08828 seconds (79.00% PHP - 21.00% MySQL) with 10 queries |