Compression drivers in horns or waveguides - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st December 2008, 06:39 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default Compression drivers in horns or waveguides

Does the increased sensitivity and max SPL come only from the restricted radiation pattern (e.g. going from full-space to half-space to quarter-space radiation), or is there another mechanism which further boosts the SPL?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 06:50 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State College, PA
Send a message via AIM to Rybaudio Send a message via MSN to Rybaudio
Great question. The answer is yes there is another mechanism. When you place a horn on the front of the speaker you increase the radiation impedance seen by the front of the cone. That increases the effeciency (electrical to acoustic power) of the system. Note that the mechanism you pointed out, shoving the power into a smaller area, only increases the pressure in that area and not the total radiated power, hence not the efficiency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 06:54 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Yes, the efficiency is the ratio of output power to input power, so if input power doesn't change, output power doesn't change either (from the factor you pointed out). Fairly trivial.

How much boost do we get from the transforming of the radiation impedance?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 07:04 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego
Take a compression driver apart, and you'll see it's constructed a lot like a bandpass subwoofer. There's a driver which fires into a compression driver, and another chamber on the other side of the diaphragm, with a port (aka the throat.)

So there's at least three things increasing the efficiency:

#1 - Compression drivers use a motor which is outrageously large, literally 5x the size of the motor on a conventional tweeter.
#2 - Limiting the bandwidth of the driver increases the efficiency. The response of a compression driver is typically half as wide as a direct radiator (it's a bandpass design after all.)
#3 - The horn or waveguide focuses the acoustic energy into a narrow cone, increasing on-axis efficiency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 07:11 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada

#1 and #2 exist regardless of whether there is something in front of the compression driver. I'm looking for stuff more like #3 (and I'd really wish you'd use sensitivity and not efficiency in this context).
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 07:16 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State College, PA
Send a message via AIM to Rybaudio Send a message via MSN to Rybaudio
Quote:
Originally posted by 454Casull
How much boost do we get from the transforming of the radiation impedance?
That depends on a lot of factors. The driver's parameters, the enclosure the driver is in, and the horn all effect this. It is also frequency dependent. I don't have a rule of thumb or simple example for you and I don't have the time to come up with one right now, but I do have a picture of the basic circuit representation of the system. The key is that increasing the radiation impedance (Zrad in the circuit) increases the ratio of the power dissipated in the acoustic circuit to the power dissipated in the rest of the circuit, hence increases the efficiency.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg transducer model2.jpg (32.0 KB, 280 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 12:41 PM   #7
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
Mostly all correct

There are three factors that dominate increased "sensitivity"

1) large magnet and Voice coil
2) compression ratio increases actual efficiency
3) waveguide focusing more SPL in forward direction increase sentivitivty, but not efficiency.

How much of each one occurs in dependent on the specific design. There is no one answer.

With a DE250 on an OS waveguide its going to be all three in approximately equal amounts as this combination is designed to optimize sensitivity so everything is done that can be done - very large motor, high compression ratio, narrow coverage angle.

But a direct radiating tweeter on a small wide waveguide is going to gain principly from 3 as there isn't much loading effect and the motor structure hasn't changed.

Any combination of these factors is possible.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
smith horns and using compression horns for a Karlson party speaker project bikehorn Multi-Way 14 30th January 2013 05:20 PM
New & Vintage compression drivers, horns, JBL, Emilar, BMS dogbert Swap Meet 8 9th February 2011 04:34 AM
Compression Drivers without Horns? NV&H Multi-Way 17 15th August 2007 06:03 PM
WANTED: Horns & Compression Drivers Carl_Huff Swap Meet 5 14th May 2007 07:43 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2