|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
It is possible to determine the T/S parameters by adding mass to the cone. Is it ever done to add mass permanently. What are the pro's and cons?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Added mass is probably the most common technique. Just make sure that you keep the added mass close to the voice coil connection to the cone. I have used clay but I prefer solder pieces (heavy lead) with a little dry adhesive as it makes a tighter fit to the cone - added mass must be firmly attached to work right.
I have added mass to a speaker in subwoofer apps for example. I just glue on pieces of solder. Balance it as well as possible. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
Is there method for calculating the new specs?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New England
|
Quote:
I dont' think so. You'll need to run a test with a dedicated woofer tester instrument. They are for sale at PE. The classic Snell Model A used add mass on the RCF 12 inch woofer. They poured a resin around the porous dust cap to about 1/2 inch depth. It lowers the Fs and efficiency is sacrificed as the trade-off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
Quote:
If you look up the basic equations for TS parameters its easy to see what added mass will do. It lowers Fs and raises both Qes and Qms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
For next to nothing with Speaker Workshop and a handful of parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
|
WinISD Pro can simulate a box and allow you to add mass to the driver to see the effect it will have on the driver in that box. Ideal if your doing a ported or sealed box
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
For purposes of testing "poster caulk" ( sold at office supply stores ) works ( see audioXpress November 2008 p 35 ).
Usually 200 grams or less is used. For permanent application - lead ( as in solder recommended above ). Also lead foil is sold in golf pro shops |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ga
|
I have the free version of WinISD. How do i make the changes to simulate additional weight?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
|
This is just a thought as I've not tried it, but would epoxy with a suitable filler like barium oxide or powdered nickel be any good for adding mass permanently??.
I ask as I still have a litre of West Systems epoxy and powdered aluminium and stainlees stell left over from a heatsink experiment. Regards Ted
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding cone mass | fdeck | Multi-Way | 12 | 17th June 2009 06:06 PM |
| Low Qts drivers : Adding mass | 316a | Multi-Way | 20 | 4th May 2006 02:27 PM |
| Can somebody explain the pros/cons of adding cone mass? | GuyPanico | Subwoofers | 25 | 16th April 2005 03:50 AM |
| Adding mass to PR.... | hofffam | Subwoofers | 1 | 7th January 2005 12:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16240 seconds (56.71% PHP - 43.29% MySQL) with 10 queries |